<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domestic Partnerships, Not Just for Gays</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:37:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: a fool</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-27253</link>
		<dc:creator>a fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/#comment-27253</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Matthew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Matthew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-27251</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/#comment-27251</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather a domestic partnership than marriage and all the antiquated religious baggage that it carries with it anyways.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather a domestic partnership than marriage and all the antiquated religious baggage that it carries with it anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby Hawk</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-27249</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 01:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/#comment-27249</guid>
		<description>I think you are right. We should have protecstion when a partner dies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are right. We should have protecstion when a partner dies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucy Lockett</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-27247</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy Lockett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/#comment-27247</guid>
		<description>This sort of thing happens all the time, part of the pain of dying. People can just be downright lousy and greedy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sort of thing happens all the time, part of the pain of dying. People can just be downright lousy and greedy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-27245</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/#comment-27245</guid>
		<description>im against this. If Mrs. Epstein was smart she would have directed the money and house to who ever she willed too. This is not at all a solution but rather causes more problems. The only reason id say the 2 wouldnt go into a signed relationship as this was for not being homosexual, as only someone as such would sign such as this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im against this. If Mrs. Epstein was smart she would have directed the money and house to who ever she willed too. This is not at all a solution but rather causes more problems. The only reason id say the 2 wouldnt go into a signed relationship as this was for not being homosexual, as only someone as such would sign such as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pseudonym</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/comment-page-1/#comment-27243</link>
		<dc:creator>Pseudonym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/activism/domestic-partnerships-not-just-for-gays/#comment-27243</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never really thought about this before, but you are so right! With so many people not able to get on the property ladder it really makes sense. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never really thought about this before, but you are so right! With so many people not able to get on the property ladder it really makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
