Image via Wikipedia

Image via Wikipedia

Fantasy, connect with actuality.

In dream, Valentines Day is a day when you walk from reasoning to reasoning into the arms and fingers of a delicate, but not too much delicate personal with Glove Romney’s looks and Bob Christie’s individuality — or, er, viceversa, or, er, never thoughts, just get Mitch Daniels over here.

In actuality, Valentines Day, is just another Wednesday when I have to think about John Santorum. I’m sure it’s like this for many Individuals in america.

For much of the nation, it’s yet another day when you are advised that the chief executive of the U. s. Declares seemingly has a more sensible relationship than you do. “Hey, @MichelleObama:, Satisfied Valentines Day. -bo,” the President tweeted. “I wonder how Al Natural finished up on our playlist, @BarackObama! -mo,” the First Woman reacted, later.

Oscar Wilde mentioned that couples proposition is like “washing a person’s clear page in community.” That about amounts up my thoughts, as well with a little more fist-shaking.

But it’s not just the Obamas. One might be able to take a position that, or at least to system ourselves with the believed that later, the chief executive will have to describe his contraceptive plan to the ladies.

Heck, Newt Gingrich has a more sensible relationship than you do. Newt informed journalists that — well, I’ll extra you. There is no purpose you should be created to experience as I have. All I will tell you is that he believes that he will create Callista “quite happy.” Maybe he’s preparing to depart her! But then again Callista and I clearly do not have the same concept of what comprises pleasure. As for the relax of their programs for the night time, the less said the better. On this factor, I replicate Jezebel’s Cassie Murdoch’s emotions.

Even for us less special Individuals in america, we’ve achieved the factor on Valentines Evening hours when “free ecards” begins defeating “flower delivery” in the Serps. I like The look for engines Styles. They add a certain touching of reality to the process. Check out too many advertisements and you become assured that these elements basically occur by wonder. A cherub arms and fingers your spouse sweets. But in fact it is not so. If I had a penny for each time people explored, “Last Instant Bloom Shipping,” I’d be Passable Preparations.Com. And as the day lessens, the romanticism of blossoms and sweets is easily being replaced by the severe, dull reality of the e-card. In other words a quotation, nothing says “I absolutely and absolutely forgot” like an e-card. More believed has gone into passing someone a gently used cells you found at the end of your bag.

Fantasy, connect with actuality. It’s Valentines Evening hours.

Smoke is the way politicians say words.  The way in which the politicians say things can make a huge difference.  Words are always crafted diligently to appease the crowd.  Depending on the crowd, these words may vary.  To cut spending, in political speak means they will tone down how much they spend.  This is not a cut, but spending less.  If we spend less, we are still spending.  No matter how we say it, if we weed out the waste, the seventeen trillion owed at the end of this political term, can be cut out all together in less then five years.

in five years, if Americans start treating politicians like employees, and stop letting them all, take advantage of us all, we can cut out the debt all together.  By eliminating all pork projects, stopping all bail outs, ending all accounts to all foreign nations, becoming our own manufacturer of oil, coal, weeding out all unnecessary regulations, making taxes obsolete, bu using a flat tax will end the debt all together.  A flat tax means everyone pays their fair share.  There would be no loop holes, a simple flat tax will insure that those who earn so little pay a little, and those who make the big bucks pay more.  One more thing, if we eliminated all useless government posts, government jobs that do nothing, and stop paying diplomats for looking good, we can have a surplus.  Lets not even get started on golf games, vacations, and living like a king.  We roll in the mud while they tell us they know what we are feeling but do they?  The President lives rent free, travels for free, and vacations for free.  When is the last time America had a vacation?  The poor can survive with their hand outs, the sick can like easier, and the elderly can keep that money they paid into the fund.  Lets not cut any important programs, or let them tell us we need to, but lets do cut the fat off of our steak in America.

As I said, all politicians are to blame.  We cannot place all the blame for everything that happened in the past twelve years on George W.  If politics practiced honesty, instead of trying to fool all of the people all of the time, we would all be better off.  If four years into a Presidency, Obama still blames Bush for all our woes, what can we believe in?  The blame game will always be there, that is one of those tricks of the trade.  America, be smarter then your employee, be smarter then that, because if we let those politicians trounce on us, we fail as an employer.  Now, all those bail outs, they are paying us back so, where is out dividend?  When they say, they are paying the tax payers money, that is a whole lit of bull.  They are spending revenues made.  We pay to live, but we don’t need to spend to survive.

It’s just as we’ve always assumed; Conservatives are stupid.  They are Conservative because they are afraid of change and find anything ‘different’  be it a person’s race, language, ethnicity, diet or dress, scarey. They are Conservative because they do not have the intellect to reason, extrapolate, imagine or visualise anything different from what they know.

As stupid people they grip an idea without doubt or pause as their thought processes are not flexible. Hence they score rather lower than those who have the freedom to explore new ideas. 

The Canadian researchers hypothesize that people who “have trouble grasping the complexity of the world” may tend toward prejudice and conservatism because they crave structure and can’t process chaos and nuance. Religion, authoritarianism, and isolationism appeal to a desire for order in a world that offers few absolutes.

This is why, for example, in America, someone as hollow and hypocritical as Sarah Palin gained followers because she’s safe.  She’s just like that two faced phoney down the road.  She isn’t more intelligent than the average shop clerk, she doesn’t use language that a bus driver wouldn’t know; in short she is as stupid as those who support her.

If you think it’s interesting that people can still vote even after they take their last breath, you also might find it interesting that there are 2.8 million people in our country who are legally registered to vote in more than one state. So if we leave the regulating of voting in the hands of our Federal government to oversee voting registrations, that there should be some great turn outs from the walking dead and those gifted individuals who can bi-locate (be in two places at one time) when election day calls for everybody to perform their civic duty.

As much as I wish I could simply mail in my votes so I can maximize my need to watch more Dish TV and avoid the crowds, I realize that there can be no substitute for casting a ballot at the voting booth. Historically there’s an overwhelming amount of disputes when it comes to votes that are mailed in, and by no stretch of the imagination do I want to find out that my own vote could be in dispute. While most people are honest, there are some people out there that will try to cast votes on behalf of those who are no longer living, or try to cast multiple votes in the states where they have multiple registrations. You can guarantee that those particular votes will be cast through the mail since it’s much easier for those unscrupulous individuals to pass themselves off as somebody else when they don’t have to be physically present. With this in mind, all I can do is urge others to do the same and be present at the polls come election day.

Like Communism, libertarianism is an philosophy that looks excellent on newspaper. According to libertarianism, everyone is accountable for themselves and nothing else. The concern becomes whether this philosophy is as excellent in exercise as this indicates in composing. And the judgment for that is combined.

I say at the beginning that libertarianism is far from the scariest element out there. Wahabbism, Stalinism and army dictatorships are much more intense. But what is the actuality of libertarianism?

Having known folks who resided a libertarian way of life, I had plenty of a chance to see their encounter. And one element I’ve seen typical to all of them is that they all stay very troubled life. They are always determined to be at the top of everything, such as factors that they can do very little about, and are regularly being concerned. If the economic climate requires a plunge, their market prevents increasing, or their job gets contracted, they are in a bad way. If they or a loved one produces an sickness, more so.

Another issue I’ve seen is that libertarianism seems to have a bad impact on peoples’ personality. I’ve seen even the kindest, hottest individuals develop into factors as they accepted libertarian way of life. The mind-set of everyone for themselves does away with much excellent in people; and just as their life become troubled, traumatic and challenging, so does their personality also take a plunge.

Finally, there is much that is not calculated in libertarian considering. Thus, residence is seen as characteristics become effective use; but no value is seen for characteristics. This allows for meaningless, dangerous, short-sighted reasonable methods – such as losing the Amazonian marketplace or surging the environment with CO2 – while declining to incentivize advancement and inventiveness that actually create capitalism perform as designed. Also not calculated is the wide participation to the economic climate that is done by agencies that are not private: Altruistically-valued, government-funded technological innovation that’s at the main of all technology; altruistically-valued knowledge that creates individuals employable; and govt tasks, such as the Road and the Online, that offer an facilities on which personal business enterprise can do its perform. In both situations a wide error is made; and in both situations the outcomes are as bad as would be predicted from such significant oversights.

Is libertarianism malevolent? No; but neither was Marxism. Many libertarians are completely well-intentioned and think that they will work to carry about a better community. Marxists did as well. Rather libertarianism is imperfect and isn’t able to involve many key. And until these aspects are provided, libertarianism will keep generate gloomy outcomes such as the ones I’ve described.

Still higher issues take position when libertarians want to create everyone stay the same way that they do. This smacks of totalitarianism – something that’s completely incompatible with an philosophy of independence. It’s the same scenario as is discovered with the individuals who maintain that they are “protecting the household.” Nobody is avoiding individuals who want to have a atomic household from having a atomic household. The issue is that the winners of “family values” want to reject individuals the right to stay any other way. The same is the scenario with coercive libertarianism. An philosophy of independence has no company enterprise driving everyone to look at it; and if it does, then it prevents being an philosophy of independence and becomes another way of coercive inhabitants management.

Perhaps libertarians should have a analyze run of their philosophy. Maybe they could have a condition or two and see how their methods perform there. If they perform well, more individuals will want to look at the same practices; if they don’t, then they won’t. At any amount independence is reality-determined and not ideology-determined. And that is as much the scenario for those who don’t want to be libertarians as it is the scenario for those who do.

Democracy is a system of government in which the people take an active part by voting for their leaders and removing them from office if they believe they have failed. Totalitarianism is a system in which one group or even one person (or dictator) has complete control over the people in a country.

The United States has a representative democracy, called also a republic. The people elect a President, congressional representatives, and other officials to represent them in positions of leadership.

The U.S. government is divided into three branches. The legislative branch (Congress) makes the laws. The executive branch proposes and enforces the laws and manages the affairs of state. The judicial branch decides whether or not laws are constitutional – not contrary to principles in the Constitution of the United States. All branches of government must perform these duties within the limits described in the Constitution.

Countries such as Great Britain, Japan and Sweden are also representative democracies with basic laws, basic freedoms, and elections. Elected representatives sit in legislative assemblies similar to Congress. For traditional reasons, however, these nations still have monarchs who serve as advisors and have no real power. These countries are called constitutional, or limited, monarchies.

Is it better to wake up dead or be dead to waking up? ~Dean A. Banks, D.D.

Judgment?

Do not condemn your brother or sister or come down on them for the choices they make. It is not your right to judge another based on your feelings, what is said in the scriptures and what is taught by those who choose resistance and hate. It’s OK to disagree with what choices they make and reveal the results of the choices they make but NOT to condemn them for making those choices. You have NOT walked in their shoes and experienced what they have learned. You do not feel as they do, experience what they have lived and learned what they have been taught. If you disagree with what they do because it does not contribute to the mutual growth and expansion of all concerned, then seek a way express yourself without hurting another. However, if what they are doing is hurting others, then speak the truth and identify what they are doing to all concerned. Be a light unto the world and don’t allow darkness and deception to proliferate. ~Dean A. Banks, D.D.

Greed?

Only when our congresspersons serve jail time for taking money from corporations will our system begin to purge itself. Until then, greed and ego will reign supreme. Pray for them, vote them out of office and vote for genuine representatives. It’s all about control, domination and manipulation. First, corporations and lobbyists pay off our representatives, dominate their agendas and manipulate laws in their favor. When their term(s) are up, the same corporations hire them as ‘advisors’ because they have lived how the ’system’ works. Greed and selfish motivation is all they care about. They surely don’t care about their constituency with the high unemployment and ‘entitlement’ reform. Keep their corporate financial suppliers happy at all costs; which usually comes out of our pockets. ~Dean A. Banks, D.D.

Order the book Spiritual Growth: Articles of Expectation by Dean A. Banks, D.D. This book shows you how to scientifically discover your own truth.

https://www.createspace.com/3691279

http://www.facebook.com/spiritualgrowthbook

     Now to find him, you need to think about where a man of these qualities would be. Intelligent?  Exploring other cultures? Likes to meet other people? Likes to travel and study philosophy?

     Considering all of these factors, perhaps he would be in the library or museum. He could be contemplating going to India so that he could be involved in deep discussions of philosophy.  He loves to think deep and know all kinds of religions.

     Maybe you would find him on a cruise to Alaska.  He would surely want to know how beautiful and unique Alaska is and perhaps he would want to know Sarah Palin’s philosophy of life.

     Don’t forget he is also a social butterfly, so he will be flitting around at different events.  Maybe you would find him in a travel group or a book club. I really wouldn’t look for him in a grocery store because I think he would be too busy for such a mundane thing as cooking.

     Now for some negative things about a Sagittarius man: He doesn’t have a lot of patience, so forgot about asking him to help you with a detailed project. He’s just not into a lot of details.

     Sagittarius is a fire sign and linked with the element of fire. Like all other fire signs, he will be idealistic in vision and tactless in his expressions.  Don’t be surprised if he sounds insulting and short, he just lacks tact. He is not even aware of how he sounds, so perhaps you could be the one to make him aware of how he comes off and polish him up a bit.  Let him know that his bluntness is hurting your feelings.

     The biggest negative of Sagittarius is that because he loves to travel and is very outgoing, you may have some problems keeping him faithful and on track. It would be a good idea for you to accompany him on these trips and keep your romance and love for him burning.

     If you are Aries or Leo, you are a lucky girl because you should be very compatible with Sagittarius men. If you are Gemini, Libra and Aquarius, you would be a good match, though maybe not quite as much as Aries or Leo. Remember, thought, that compatibility is a very general guideline and for an even clearer understanding, you would need to study synastry (the horoscopes of both parties are considered with particular reference to the positions of the Sun and Moon and Venus and Mars).

    The Sagittarius man seems to have more good qualities than bad. So good luck in your quest to find him and experience true love and devotion.

Source:

http://www.wikipedia.org/

Castro returned to Cuba the next year with a band of guerrilla fighters (soldiers who specialize in small, hit-and-run raids). A party of 80 landed in Oriente Province. All but 12 were killed or captured. Those who were left hid in the Sierra Maestre Mountains, and from this small number Castro’s forces grew to several thousand. They began winning important victories over Batista’s forces. Castro occupied Havana on New Year’s Day of 1959, Batista fled, and Castro was named prime minister.

Castro seized property owned by wealthy Cubans, Americans, and others. He favored the lower classes and made Cuba a Communist state. Though reliant on Soviet aid, Castro maintained his independence. He improved Cuba’s health, housing and education facilities but did not solve its economic problems. With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the island’s economic problems worsened.