Global Hunger and Free Markets
A new multi-billion dollar U.S. aid bill – Global Food Security Act or the Lugar-Casey Act – aims to direct more money toward GM research as part of U.S. foreign aid programs. What are the issues involved?
Freedom From Hunger through Technology?
G8 would like to improve agricultural productivity through a technological agricultural revolution, more specifically, the fast-track adoption of genetically modified crops. A genetically modified organism (GMO) is one that has a foreign gene injected into its embryonic cells. Under the articles of agreement of WTO, the food giants have been granted unrestricted freedom to enter the seed markets of developing countries. The GM food have wide ranging implications for the farmer, the health concerns of the consumer and maintaining the rich biodiversity of the environment. Let’s consider a few of them:
- The GMO technology threatens livelihoods of farmers and locks them into bio serfdom. The farmer cannot save the GMO seeds for subsequent replanting without paying royalties to Monsanto or other biotech giants he has bought the seeds from, though this was his traditional practice since thousands of years. And the GMO seeds are expensive. This has been made possible by the acquisition of exclusive “intellectual property rights” over native plant varieties and pirated centuries of farmers’ innovation in developing several varieties of rice, cotton, mustard, corn, and soy. To ensure that farmers have no option but to return to the seed companies year after year, biotechnology giants like Monsanto have developed ‘suicide seeds’ that produce sterile crops. The major agro biotech companies have also developed ‘traitor technology’, where seeds are engineered to produce negative traits unless treated with the company’s own chemicals.These are newer forms of colonialism that will convert an indigenous farmer into an industrial worker.
- The GM crops destroy the micro-organisms of the soil and the food chain that depend on it – weeds, insects, birds and other wildlife, and replace it with genetically uniform crops that are more susceptible to disease. They require the use of highly toxic ‘broad spectrum’ herbicides designed to wipe out all plants other than the crops that have been genetically engineered to tolerate the herbicide.
- Due to the threat of contamination, it is difficult for normal crops or organic crops to remain free from the impact of GM crops once these have been released. Secondary, unintended gene transfer can take place from GM pollens released into the environment. An example is the famous lawsuit Monsanto Vs Schmeiser: Classic David vs Goliath struggle
- There are evidences of the grave risks GM foods pose for human and animal health and for the environment, including creating new strains of antibiotic resistant bacteria, new viruses from those introduced into the transgenic plants, causing reactivation of dormant viruses and producing harmful effects including cancer.
Genetic engineering has failed to significantly increase crop yields. The marginal increase in growth achieved so far is much less than what has been achieved by conventional breeding and organic farming techniques. International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development reports that low-input, low-cost agro-ecological farming methods that reintegrate natural systems into agriculture can maximize sustainability, ecosystem services, and biodiversity.
So that’s what the Global Security Act sets out to do – expand the markets for agribusiness, destroy the environment as well as the livelihoods of rural farmers and in fact, perpetuate hunger.
Here’s food for thought: What will happen in the even of an unforeseen flood/drought that swipes clean the agricultural lands? Read Doom’s Day Seed Vault
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post CommentMelody SJAL
On September 3, 2009 at 2:49 am
Very scary. Thanks for this insightful piece.
unown971
On September 3, 2009 at 2:56 am
Great article!
Louie Jerome
On September 3, 2009 at 5:45 am
You raise some important points here but I wonder if we will ever solve the problem of world hunger. My view, put very simply, is that there are ‘haves’ who waste food resources, and ‘have nots’, but there is no ‘flow’ between the two.
cutedrishti8
On September 3, 2009 at 7:01 am
Nice one to share..Great work…
cuba123
On September 3, 2009 at 8:52 am
Keep Up The Good Work !
Ravana
On September 3, 2009 at 10:50 am
How about hoarding to stop price fall by the traders ?
One of the best articles on an important topic.
Keep writing more.
Leonardo da Vinci E.
On September 3, 2009 at 11:17 am
food for thought.
tasha kazuki
On September 3, 2009 at 12:20 pm
Now the people are feeling the wrath of the earth and environment caused by humanity’s abuse.
Nikita K
On September 3, 2009 at 2:04 pm
I believe that the hunger in the world will only end through GM crops. I think that technology has a lot of scope to improve but allergies and all those things are a pile of rubbish to be honest because just because people are against something because of ethical reasons, they will find every reason in the world to go against it. If some one hates something, they’ll do everything to continue hating it and these stories of GM crops failing may have some evidence but it isn’t enough to change thoughts. There are people dying and GM crops are able to grow in harsh conditions like Africa. GM crops are the future despite the glitches in the technology which can still improve. Interesting article and wonderfully researched with a good opinion!
emmahaynes
On September 3, 2009 at 2:16 pm
Very moving article Thanks for the share
Uma Shankari
On September 3, 2009 at 2:27 pm
Atikin, I’m very happy about the questions you have raised concerning the safety vs. utility of GM foods. I’d like to devote a full length article for this purpose. And then I’ll post the links here.
Thanks for your encouraging words.
ken bultman
On September 3, 2009 at 5:41 pm
I, too, remain unconvinced that human health danger lurks in the ingestion of GM produced foods. I do know that the choke hold patent owners have on producers is going to be debilitating. As for G-8 and the U.N., for that matter, government in agriculture is very similar to government in health care. It’s meddling.
Joe Dorish
On September 3, 2009 at 7:07 pm
When government gets involved expect things to go badly, that is what all of history teaches us.
Ruby Hawk
On September 3, 2009 at 8:44 pm
I have read a little about it and I too, think we should leave our seeds alone. We should never tamper with our seed that we have planted and reaped since the beginning of time. If some disease befalls these seeds we will have nothing to fall back on. And people who farm should have the right to keep their own seed,plant and to harvest as they please.
Guy Hogan
On September 3, 2009 at 9:31 pm
Warnings about these very things you point out in your article have been spreading for some time. When the G-20 meets this month in Pittsburgh, there will be protestors protesting about the destructive impact of unrestricted free trade on the local food supply of so-called developing nations. I believe the protesters are right.
chitragopi
On September 3, 2009 at 10:07 pm
Terrifying information on GMO technology.
Eunice Tan
On September 4, 2009 at 12:25 am
Important thing to think about
valli
On September 4, 2009 at 9:09 pm
An insightful piece.
monica55
On September 5, 2009 at 1:28 am
I believe that most of the inequities between nations are kept that way by dominant ones as a way to maintain the “status-quo”, and now that they will have to feed you shows how much you are indebted to them. A greast insightful article.
Monica.
Christine Ramsay
On September 5, 2009 at 2:24 am
A lot of important and thought provoking information here. An excellent article.
Christine
Sourav
On September 5, 2009 at 5:04 pm
Very impressive.
PR Mace
On September 6, 2009 at 9:29 pm
Excellent article. It is quite thought provoking.
Joshua Miguel
On September 6, 2009 at 10:26 pm
very strong points. i agree with some of your opinions. overall, free trade is not really the solution in solving global hunger. there are other ways. The G8 nations are not really 100% “for the world”, they have their own interests to protect.