The Role of Government in the Free-market Economy – Part I
What characterizes a free-market economy, its strengths and weaknesses? Conservatives and liberals differ significantly in how government should (or should not) intervene in the free market.
In our nation’s history, the struggle between the liberal and conservative wings of government has centered on the role, if any, government should play in addressing the weaknesses of a free market and encouraging economic growth. The conservative view of government’s role has been generally that of “laissez-faire” or to leave the free market to correct itself while stimulating the supply-side of the economy through tax incentives and management of the money supplied through the financial system of banks and other lenders. The conservative solution would also include relieving businesses of burdensome regulations that hamper profit and incentive. The liberal view has been to stimulate the economy’s demand-side via the government’s direct injection of money, which it either borrows by issuing government debt or collects by imposing income taxes, into specific economic sectors. A liberal policy would also include managing the supply of money through banks and other lenders and encouraging regulations to police business practices that would be unfair or harmful to the public at large. While both the liberal and conservative sides would, through the Federal Reserve Bank, manage the money supply, their tax policies could differ significantly, with Liberals emphasizing that the income tax burden should be borne primarily by those with greater ability to pay it, but with Conservatives emphasizing a lesser degree by which those of greater ability to pay the income tax burden should in fact bear it. The controversy thus centers on the role of government in the free-market economy.
Liked it


-
Post CommentLeonardo da Vinci E.
On August 17, 2009 at 1:00 pm
If I followed the rules of society and created an invention which allowed me to buy up all the land in America and own it. Then I decided to order everyone off the land. Would that be fair? Would people do it? What is the priority: System or Welfare of whole populations?