What Caused the Financial Melt Down?
This article covers what caused the melt down in the American economy.
Our treasury secretary Henry Paulson offered to save the banking system if Congress would only give him 700 billion dollars for him to purchase toxic assets, meaning bad home loans. He asked for the money with no strings attached and remarkably congress gave it to him in two 350 billion dollar increments. George Bush intended for Paulson to use 350 billion to shore up the system and then leave the other 350 billion for Barack Obama to deal with any issues in his presidency. Somehow Paulson convinced Barack and George to turn the money over to him early so he could have all 700 billion right away. When he took in the money rather than buying up assets he bought up a percentage of all the top banks in America and negotiated terms with them for heavy handed loans passed out by our government to the banks. He never bought a single asset other than the banks themselves. He used the money to fully fund these institutions which either were complicit in the deception or had no part in it and did not want to sell out to the government but were forced to. Either way this is where we sit today. Our banks are under the thumb of our government. The corporations have all been vilified all though most had nothing to do with this melt down and the entity most responsible for the chaos, the government is now taking ownership of the banks.
Why is the government the most responsible for this collapse? Primarily they are responsible, for their complete lack of oversight of the pseudo government entities Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae. They refused to listen to regulators that demanded better oversight. These companies were allowed to make ridiculously irresponsible loans and sell the loans in unregulated bundles to countries and companies all over the world with the US government giving their unofficial but very real backing to the product. If the companies were private they would of simply collapsed under the weight of their own stupidity but because they were semi government entities they were given the backing of the American Tax Payer. The people, who are now calling for regulations of our banking system, are the same people who were in charge of regulating Freddie and Fannie. The reason AIG nearly died is because of Credit Default swaps or insurance policies they had written on companies that traded in these giant Mortgage bundles. AIG was made out to be the bad guy by the media but their only crime was insuring companies that had long track records of success. In hindsight it is easy to see they should not have sold those policies but can you really fault them for selling policies on companies that the government had loaned billions of dollars to and were invested in the safest investment known to exist at the time the Credit default swaps were written.
The following link is a political attack piece but it does demonstrate what went on.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post CommentNathan G
On June 29, 2009 at 12:36 pm
First time i came on this page an advert came up and i couldn’t close it. Anyway this is interesting and well laid out. IO lost my job today which drew me to this. I’ve learnt some new things
clafleur
On June 30, 2009 at 3:17 am
I agree with the technical aspects of what you are pointing out, but i just want to add this, the economy is not built on free market any more, it is built on greed and some people beside the originators need to go to jail. the FBI already knocked on my brothers door and he felt like they should have been talking to the underwriter instead. No one who bought a hose next door to me told the banks or the originator to give us a liars loan!
REPuckett
On July 11, 2009 at 2:31 am
You and I think a lot alike, Brad. lol
Sheila M
On July 11, 2009 at 3:13 am
i never honestly understood… in general, but … this makes america look very financially irresponsible, doesnt it?
cybertruth
On July 11, 2009 at 3:24 am
im rather impressed, brad! you actually took an amazingly comlplicated subject and clarified it for the masses.
B.S. Kitty
On July 11, 2009 at 6:05 am
Good job! What a touchy subject for us suffering masses.
DA Cournean
On July 11, 2009 at 9:23 am
Very interesting and informative!
I Have Had Enough
On July 11, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Brilliant article! The average man needs this sort of information, thank you!
cromanyak
On July 11, 2009 at 6:41 pm
Very well written, and easy to understand. After reading that I’m amazed at how misled we all are on this subject. Thanks Brad.
Sheila M
On July 11, 2009 at 9:22 pm
Just passing through ~ great article
sweetievee
On July 12, 2009 at 9:32 am
I think I understand the basic jist of it. So basically the government was “babysitting” Freddie and Fannie, but they didn’t keep a very good watch. Freddie and Fannie were “naughty,” and screwed us all over. And then the government used our own money to further screw us over by buying the rest of the banks.
So what does this mean for us now that they own the banks? Sorry, if that’s a stupid question. I’ll be honest, I’m not the best with legalities/mathematics, and I still don’t understand some of the loan/asset terminology….But the fact that I even understand some of it (because of your article) is amazing!
BradONeill
On July 12, 2009 at 1:25 pm
The problem with Government ownership of the banks is that they then have tighter control on who gets loaned money and who doesn\\\’t. This makes them very powerful political entities. currently the government can steer us into disaster through poor regulation. Either misguided policies like the one that led to the collapse of Freddie and Fannie or complete lack of oversight of funds that are backed by the government again just like Freddie and Fannie.
Imagine this scenario you as a business that manufactures firearms decide to support candidate A for congress. Candidate B wins. And passes a law that government banks should not loan money to manufacturers of firearms. This is a very real possibility. Another abuse of power that is certainly to come would be misguided pressure that forces the banks to make loans to companies the government wants to survive instead of letting the free markets determine success or failure.
Like for example The government decides that Newspapers are too important to fail so they require government owned banks to make loans to Newspapers at low rates keeping the newspapers artificially afloat far longer than they would of survived on their own. This hampers the development of the new technologies and allows the newspapers to operate inefficiently for a much longer time than they otherwise would be able to.
The other thing that will come about is Loans to companies that use unions, or don\\\’t use unions depending on who is in power.
Marie Milton
On July 13, 2009 at 8:31 am
my brother does commodity trading…he liked this page too…
take care
Mikayla
On July 18, 2009 at 10:55 am
The global financial crisis didn’t affect Australia as much as it affected the rest of the Western world..I’m no expert on the topic..but this article pretty much verified what I had originally thought Brad. Plus there’s no rivalry for corporate control in Australia and the Australian government are more supportive of their banks.
N. Lloyd Andrews
On August 3, 2009 at 4:24 pm
Great article Brad! Ditto on ElleWord. I had a fair understanding of how everything went down. It was nice to read something that kind of gels it all.