<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Athletes Get Paid So Much and We Don&#8217;t</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 14:00:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray Loon</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-365375</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Loon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/#comment-365375</guid>
		<description>
Although the economics and market make a sence of it and I would have to agree with those terms, the answer still avoids the problem.  Perhaps this article can open some minds up further beyond the reasoning of economics.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1255279/Fabio-Capello-dared-say-think-overpaid-footballers.html#</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the economics and market make a sence of it and I would have to agree with those terms, the answer still avoids the problem.  Perhaps this article can open some minds up further beyond the reasoning of economics.<br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1255279/Fabio-Capello-dared-say-think-overpaid-footballers.html#" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1255279/Fabio-Capello-dared-say-think-overpaid-footballers.html#</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike hawk</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-249969</link>
		<dc:creator>mike hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/#comment-249969</guid>
		<description>shut up u guys are just hating cause u guys suck at sports and are jealous that ur poor and not rich like them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shut up u guys are just hating cause u guys suck at sports and are jealous that ur poor and not rich like them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dat Man Than- Than</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-192349</link>
		<dc:creator>Dat Man Than- Than</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/#comment-192349</guid>
		<description>No body cares about your stupid conversations! DAMN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No body cares about your stupid conversations! DAMN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-62893</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/#comment-62893</guid>
		<description>The key economic concept here is actually scarcity.  These athletes have scarce skills (low supply) for which there is high demand.  Competition among potential employers (teams) drive up the salaries, particularly for those with the most scarce of skills (the Jordans and Gretzkys). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are correct in that there are many people paying for their services (high demand), but the other side of the equation is the low supply of elite athletes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The notion that this is relective of society&#039;s priorities is bang on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key economic concept here is actually scarcity.  These athletes have scarce skills (low supply) for which there is high demand.  Competition among potential employers (teams) drive up the salaries, particularly for those with the most scarce of skills (the Jordans and Gretzkys). </p>
<p>You are correct in that there are many people paying for their services (high demand), but the other side of the equation is the low supply of elite athletes.</p>
<p>The notion that this is relective of society&#8217;s priorities is bang on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-62891</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/#comment-62891</guid>
		<description>I disagree that a person salary should be proportionate to the amount of people they service.... In my opinion a jobs effect on society should determine the amount that a person is making... Also just like in the sports industry I think that society should have a salary cap as well... At least per job, now if a person wants to make more money than is provided by his profession than by all means get a second job.... Honestly I think the sports industry and the media industry should be highly taxed... They don&#039;t provide a service that is actually benefiting society, it is simply entertaining.... So in conclusion I believe that a jobs salary should be proportionate to the importance of said service.. I.E. Teachers, Police Officers, Firemen, Doctors should be paid more than musicians, athletes, and entertainers.... But that is just my opinion... I mean I understand, watching sports are fun... I&#039;m sure society would collapse without the super bowl, but maybe we would be able to find a way to survive!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree that a person salary should be proportionate to the amount of people they service&#8230;. In my opinion a jobs effect on society should determine the amount that a person is making&#8230; Also just like in the sports industry I think that society should have a salary cap as well&#8230; At least per job, now if a person wants to make more money than is provided by his profession than by all means get a second job&#8230;. Honestly I think the sports industry and the media industry should be highly taxed&#8230; They don&#8217;t provide a service that is actually benefiting society, it is simply entertaining&#8230;. So in conclusion I believe that a jobs salary should be proportionate to the importance of said service.. I.E. Teachers, Police Officers, Firemen, Doctors should be paid more than musicians, athletes, and entertainers&#8230;. But that is just my opinion&#8230; I mean I understand, watching sports are fun&#8230; I&#8217;m sure society would collapse without the super bowl, but maybe we would be able to find a way to survive!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-62889</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/#comment-62889</guid>
		<description>If everyone stopped going to a sports event or a movie or a rock concert for 3 months You would see those saleries  start to come down. Basically we the employers  would be firing them all.&lt;br /&gt;
So stop being nice guys  stay home  and let them feel what everyone else is feeling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If everyone stopped going to a sports event or a movie or a rock concert for 3 months You would see those saleries  start to come down. Basically we the employers  would be firing them all.<br />
So stop being nice guys  stay home  and let them feel what everyone else is feeling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-62885</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/#comment-62885</guid>
		<description>Maybe I am a little confused... but it is my understanding that sport franchises and movie studios set salaries regardless of the amount actually obtained by the sporting event (number of consumers) or amount of moviegoers. So how are the consumers directly affecting the salary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I am a little confused&#8230; but it is my understanding that sport franchises and movie studios set salaries regardless of the amount actually obtained by the sporting event (number of consumers) or amount of moviegoers. So how are the consumers directly affecting the salary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nancy</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-62887</link>
		<dc:creator>nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/#comment-62887</guid>
		<description>nice explanation.  still not sure they deserve what they get though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice explanation.  still not sure they deserve what they get though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To post #1</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-62883</link>
		<dc:creator>To post #1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 18:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/#comment-62883</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comments.  It is easy to make comparisons between teachers, fishermen, and other professionals who apparently have multiple people consume their service per unit time.  This is not really the case, however.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference is that every single person in a stadium (or theater) pays to consume that service.  Every child in a school does not pay to use the teacher&#039;s services, rather the tax revenue is what funds such services.  Private schools are funded through tuition, but private schools are also ridiculously expensive and for the very reason we suggest here.  I believe you alluded to this in the first paragraph, and that is the key difference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firefighters do not provide a service to millions in tandem (only one fire/emergency per unit time per firefighter).  That&#039;s the difference.  Is it possible for a firefighter to save multiple lives in a given situation?  Yes.  But it is not something he/she does every second of their job and it will not be for millions of people at a time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issue is not the availability of a service to millions of people, but the actual consumption of it by millions of people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we wanted to lower their salaries, yes, we could stop watching the games or movies.  But the truth is that it does not really affect the public in any tangible way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We should not be asking ourselves how we can lower athlete salaries, we should be asking ourselves how we can raise teacher salaries; if such is the concern.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comments.  It is easy to make comparisons between teachers, fishermen, and other professionals who apparently have multiple people consume their service per unit time.  This is not really the case, however.</p>
<p>The difference is that every single person in a stadium (or theater) pays to consume that service.  Every child in a school does not pay to use the teacher&#8217;s services, rather the tax revenue is what funds such services.  Private schools are funded through tuition, but private schools are also ridiculously expensive and for the very reason we suggest here.  I believe you alluded to this in the first paragraph, and that is the key difference.</p>
<p>Firefighters do not provide a service to millions in tandem (only one fire/emergency per unit time per firefighter).  That&#8217;s the difference.  Is it possible for a firefighter to save multiple lives in a given situation?  Yes.  But it is not something he/she does every second of their job and it will not be for millions of people at a time.</p>
<p>The issue is not the availability of a service to millions of people, but the actual consumption of it by millions of people.</p>
<p>If we wanted to lower their salaries, yes, we could stop watching the games or movies.  But the truth is that it does not really affect the public in any tangible way.</p>
<p>We should not be asking ourselves how we can lower athlete salaries, we should be asking ourselves how we can raise teacher salaries; if such is the concern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/comment-page-1/#comment-62881</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 12:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/economics/why-athletes-get-paid-so-much-and-we-dont/#comment-62881</guid>
		<description>nose bleed!!Hehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nose bleed!!Hehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

