You are here: Home » Education » Why U.s. News’ College Rankings Hurt Students

Why U.s. News’ College Rankings Hurt Students

Why U.S. News’ college rankings hurt students.

During this anniversary autumn rite, Harvard University sometimes grabs the No. 1 atom and in added years Princeton does. Last year both aggregate the title. For the 2014 rankings, Princeton came out on top.

In acknowledgment to the criticism that mars this anniversary bookish adorableness pageant, U.S. News already afresh tinkered with its academy rankings methodology. The rankings Goliath gave beneath weight to chic rank, which beneath top schools are reporting. On the added hand, U.S. News put added weight on ACT and SAT scores, which are activated by ancestors income.

Despite these corrective changes, actuality are 5 affidavit why you should avoid this year’s academy rankings:

1. Academy rankings aching low and middle-income students.

Schools affliction acutely about inching up U.S. News’ academy rankings and this is reflected in how they absorb their money. Institutions accept been focused on devoting added of their acquirement to allure acceptance with academy analysis scores, chic rankings and brand point averages. That’s to affect the rankings king.

Consequently, accessible and clandestine colleges and universities accept been cloudburst a growing bulk of money into arete scholarships for flush acceptance at the bulk of acceptance who badly charge banking help.

You can see from the blueprint beneath that the bulk of banknote getting absent to allure acceptance with no banking charge has climbed decidedly back the 1990’s. At clandestine schools, the allotment of acceptance accepting need-based aid has in actuality declined!

You can apprentice added about how rankings has helped accomplish academy added cher for low and middle-income acceptance by account an important address issued this year by the New America Foundation entitled, Undermining Pell: How Colleges Compete for Wealthy Acceptance and Leave the Low-Income Behind.

2. The rankings avoid job prospects.

Students today wish to apperceive what colleges and universities will accommodate them with a alleyway to good-paying jobs. The rankings, however, don’t accolade schools that alum acceptance who acquisition solid employment. In fact, U.S. News doesn’t even ask about application success.

3. The rankings don’t affliction about acquirements outcomes.

U.S. News fixates on how careful a academy is. It focuses on the bookish ability of a school’s freshmen, not on what happens already acceptance access at their schools. That’s like anticipation a hospital by how ailing the patients are if they arrive. Are schools accomplishing an accomplished job of educating their accuse or do they fail? U.S. News abiding doesn’t apperceive and doesn’t attack to acquisition out.

For a admirable yield on how awry the rankings are, apprehend this archetypal New Yorker section by Malcolm Gladwell: The adjustment of things: What academy rankings absolutely acquaint us.

4. U.S. News runs a adorableness pageant.

A above agency in the rankings is what everybody abroad thinks about anniversary other. Three administrators at anniversary of the institutions in the civic university category, for instance, have to appraise what they anticipate about all their aeon on a one-to-five allocation scale. What do administrators at UCLA and Notre Dame, however, apperceive about what’s traveling on at the University of Texas, Oregon State or the University of South Florida?

Because it’s a adorableness contest, the oldest, best-known schools like Princeton, Harvard, Yale, as able-bodied as advanced arts colleges such Williams, Amherst, and Swarthmore will consistently command the top spots, because they will consistently automatically ace the reputational hurdle.

5. Academy rankings ammunition anytime greater academy costs.

Colleges accept credibility credibility for biconcave money into authoritative their campuses attending beautiful. Swank apprentice unions, LEED-certified bookish barrio and able-bodied shrines to the jocks and their admirers are musts. The rankings accolade spending money, but they don’t amerce schools for charging too abundant and blame acceptance into greater debt than necessary. In fact, the asleep annual doesn’t even ask about the boilerplate apprentice debt of a school’s graduates.

Bottom Line: With all its flaws and its adverse appulse on academy behavior, why is anyone still paying absorption to these academy rankings?

Liked it
Powered by Powered by Triond