Mystery of Loch Ness Monster
Is it real or not? It may be just a dream or natural illusion. Who knows?
Of the lake monster or monster of Loch is the name of the great unknown animals, which allegedly has been sighted, and / or you believe me in freshwater, although their existence has never been scientifically confirmed. Most of them have no evidence outside the observation suspects and controversial photographs and a large part of opinion do not usually exist in the classical zoology and science on the subject, and especially the investigations of the followers of the shoes.
There are many speculations, what did the sea monster could. Many regarded them as purely exaggerations or misinterpretations are familiar and natural events or in the manufacture and hoaxes. Times are the observations of seals, otters, deer, water birds diving, big fish like giant sturgeon, the balls, space, the squid, the distortion in the light of the transition ship wakes, wave or unusual models have been proposed to explain Special reports.

Skeptics point out that the descriptions of the creatures change over time with the values of humor and local cultures, the debate on the configuration of the folk beliefs and not what was expected, if the reports were genuine encounters with real animals .
According to the Swedish scientist author Bengt Sjogren (1980), on the lake in the conviction, monsters, for example, in Loch Ness, with the legend of Kelp. Sjogren’s syndrome argues that the sea monster have in the course of history. Earlier reports often speak of horses, like the appearance, but more frequent reports of modern reptiles and more-than dinosaurs apparent successes, and Bengt Sjogren syndrome conclusion that the legend of the Kelpie to this day the legends of sea monsters.

Theories other heavily modified by the faithful, including the unknown species of giant eel or surviving aquatic, prehistoric reptiles, such as plesiosaurs. A theory that the monsters are of the view that sometimes cultivated in the form of amphibians, which are usually all minors’ rest of his life as an axolotl.
Some suggested that the animals are actually a kind of psychic phenomena. Some also have a Tanystropheus, although very few proponents of this theory. More sensible, the first real crypto zoologist Bernard Heuvelmans took place in the course of his life, that types of plesiosaur have been observing in fact an unknown species of long necked seal.
In many of these areas, particularly in the area of Loch Ness, Lake Champlain and the Okanagan Valley, the lake by these monsters have become major tourist draws.
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post Commentjoystick7
On November 24, 2008 at 12:07 am
Super!
Sotiris
On November 24, 2008 at 3:23 am
I think there is a reptile there, but not so big as they describe it. It’s one of the most atmospheric mysteries nowadays!
Leafygreens
On November 25, 2008 at 12:28 pm
The second photo looks so phony. Enjoy your article though.
cutiepie11
On January 7, 2009 at 4:12 pm
this is so not real even the second picture
ahha boi194
On February 24, 2009 at 8:54 am
your all just blowin off steam dont doubt something when you dont even know if it is real or not. WE all know that those pictures are phony balony but people will eventually fool you all for saps and make you all believe that the Lochness is real!
Nishell
On February 24, 2009 at 10:15 am
The Loch Ness Monster probably not the only kind of itself.
alex
On April 4, 2009 at 4:36 am
i think mosters ARE real and this artical really helped me because i am trying to solve it mt self and NOBODY can stop me from beliving in it its just like how somw people belive in god!
hailly
On July 16, 2009 at 6:53 pm
it looks very fake picture to me
hailly
On July 16, 2009 at 6:58 pm
picture of it is fake but for me the real one is true
you can fake a picture but you cant fake the real legends
emiel
On November 22, 2009 at 1:45 pm
I think that the monster really exists
alexis c
On April 28, 2010 at 8:27 pm
it is soooooooooooooooooooo fake it looks like a host!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Docvega
On April 29, 2010 at 11:17 am
In 1966 the RAF took an aerial photo of an unidentified object in the Loch Ness waters that was under its own motion and it was not a ship or water craft. The Tinsdale film is an excellent example of a valid sighting taken with a 35 MM film camera in 1960 by an engineer. I just love skeptics. They told us that Mountain Gorillas were a myth, that the Okapi was extinct, that the ceolocanth was an extinct dinosaur yet is found even today in the Indian ocean. Skeptics are those who would tell you a UFO doesn’t exist as it hovers over their head. They want their blind form of reality to be everyone else’s.
Docvega
On April 29, 2010 at 12:33 pm
There definitely is something to the Loch Ness monster aside from the cheesy photos. too many sightings by reliable witnesses cannot be dismissed. There have been several attempts at sonar scans using an array of ships which have had limited success with a few anomalous readings, but what authorities tend to ignore are the underwater caves or grottos where these creatures could theoretically hide or even nest. Sonar would be oblivious to such sanctuaries. The case is definitely still open for Nessie.
Aaron
On June 8, 2010 at 7:02 pm
first of all the picture are fake the first one is a snake and the second one is a rip off and is very fake and u can tell because study sshows on the news that picture was a fraud so dont say its not fake all right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!(:
K3Nl)@!!
On June 19, 2010 at 10:34 am
WOW……………… idoits these days people think there real poeple think there fake………. but c’mon face it there real if u belive in god but not these did u ever see god no but u belive… and y have they found like 200 dinosause (NO) more because there dinosaurse who live in water
fahim
On November 12, 2010 at 9:54 am
hey it may be a reptile…
Bluth Family
On January 2, 2011 at 9:07 pm
Is it me, or was that article REALLY difficult to understand?
Bluth Family
On January 2, 2011 at 9:08 pm
Is it me, or was that article REALLY difficult to understand? There were so many sentence fragments that I’m not even sure if the original article was in English.