Gay Marriage: The Key to American Unity and Equality
Arguing for gay marriage, and discussing the reasons against it.
The issue of civil rights in the United States has undergone several transitions in the course of American history. Women now have the right to vote, the ability to work outside of the home and to work in industries that were once closed to them. Women have taken control of their bodies in the sexual revolution and have gained the option of abortion. African Americans have also gained the right to vote, they are now allowed to sit next to a white person and be treated as equals; black men and women are now given the opportunities for higher education, better paying jobs, and a say in politics. However, women and blacks did not gain these civil rights without struggle. The same is true for gay marriage-it will not happen without struggle.
As with all equal rights movements there are many who doubt that same-sex marriages will be good for the United States. Just as it was believed that giving blacks equal rights to whites or that women with freedom would cause a decline in morals and values, the same is being said of same-sex marriage. The arguments against same sex marriage fail to work as sound reasoning: marriage itself has evolved and is no longer a social necessity; same-sex marriage will have no effect on the desire of others to have children; same-sex marriage will not lead to the legalization of polygamy; and civil unions are not equality, they are a stepping stone to equality.
In the last century, the idea of homosexuality has moved away from being a hidden “illness” to a proud stand of thousands of people. Same-sex marriage is not just a matter of gaining legal perks; it is a matter of happiness, which is listed as one of the inalienable rights in the Declaration of Independence. Gay marriage will not destroy the morals of America, nor will the legalization of marriage between couples of the same gender lead to polygamy.
There are several arguments against allowing same-sex marriage. Some say that marriage is an institution between just one man and one woman. Still more argue that the sole purpose of marriage is to procreate and that since couples of the same gender cannot physically reproduce there is no reason for them to enter the institution of marriage. These arguments are not unfounded, but they are outdated; marriage has changed.
The Evolution of Marriage
In the decades following California allowing no-fault divorces in 1970, divorce has become more predominant, and more widely accepted. Family structures have been shattered and rebuilt. People get divorced and then remarry, creating new families. The stigma of being a divorcee is no longer quite as socially unacceptable as it once was. The pretense or belief that divorce somehow corrupts the individual has faded in the aftermath of so many divorces. It is no longer an effective means of controlling the behavior of adults or limiting the changes in the foundation of marriage.
Liked it


-
-
-
Post CommentGlynis
On June 1, 2008 at 12:11 pm
My cousin and his partner have just celebrated their civil marriage in the UK, it was done very tastefully and brought only joy to those involved, they have been together 25yrs and harmed no-one. It is a difficult thing for some to accept but in this day and age of all things different, why not? Great read thanks
Derek
On July 30, 2008 at 10:00 pm
I can only hope that the truth about same-sex marriage will spread, and that it will show with increasing legislation to overturn disgraceful bans on marriage equality.
Alexander Jay Sheridan
On May 19, 2009 at 12:52 pm
I will have to say that I disagree with you on this one.
I believe marriage should be defined by only one man and one woman. I was delivered from homosexuality and it is really just a sexual addiction. I pray that God would deliver homosexuals through Jesus Christ so that they might be able to have lasting marriages in the future with people of the opposite sex.