You are here: Home » Government » Compromises of the US Constitution

Compromises of the US Constitution

How the United States Constitution is made up mostly of compromises for the American citizens.

One of the commonly heard theories about the United States constitution is that it is made up almost entirely of compromises. Some feel that these compromises were put into place in order to satisfy the wants, and make an attempt at canceling out the fears held by the American people. The negotiations dealt with many areas of the country and ranged from the power given to the government, to the individual rights and duties of the US citizens.

One of the biggest and most obvious compromises made within the constitution, was known as the “Great Compromise.” This bill, ratified on July 16, 1787, had mostly to do with finding a way of establishing new branches of the United States government. The first of two plans presented was the Virginia Plan, which called for the government to be split into three separate branches. The legislature would consist of two houses; one would be elected by the people, and the other chosen by the first house from those nominated by the state legislators. Along with this, the national legislator would choose the President and National Judiciary. The New Jersey Plan on the other hand, wanted to amend the articles in order to allow for a stronger overall government. Also they felt that in order to be fair, each state should only be able to have a single vote in the Congress. The Great Compromise wanted to satisfy everyone, so the final agreement was a mixture of both the Virginia and New Jersey Plans. The legislature would be made up of two houses; one based on population and elected by the people, and the other house allowed two senators per state to be appointed.

Another compromise made was the Northwest Ordinance and along with this, the three-fifths clause. This mainly had to do with Southern states, and their demands that their escaped slaves be returned to them. This then allowed for the free slaves to be chased up into the Northern states and be recaptured for the use of labor. This also resulted in the illegal kidnapping of thousands of free black slaves throughout the entire country. After this occurred, the government authorized the three-fifths clause which made it so that three-fifths of all slaves would count towards population in terms of taxation and representation. The North did not take that much issue with this change, because they felt it best not to further antagonize any southerners. Their main goal was to create a new government, and they believed that slavery would have absolutely no economic potential whatsoever.

3
Liked it
User Comments
  1. josh

    On October 16, 2008 at 7:33 pm


    very helpful

  2. Brian Daniel Stankich

    On October 18, 2008 at 8:32 pm


    Ecast, nice summary. I want to read more American history. I haven’t read much since school. I also would love to study the Bill of Rights and amendments more so I can better understand our corporate and individual rights.

  3. Taylor

    On May 4, 2009 at 3:23 pm


    stupid

  4. myasia

    On May 20, 2009 at 2:11 am


    very good info that i needed to get perfect!!

  5. mack

    On May 22, 2009 at 4:20 pm


    good summery alot of it i needed GREAT!!!!!!

  6. Constitution

    On May 31, 2009 at 12:49 pm


    What are three compromises that went into the constitution

  7. Do the Research

    On September 16, 2009 at 10:16 pm


    so many inaccuracies its not even funny
    uggg reading this makes me feel sick. The Northwest Ordinance was about the area to the west of the Appalachian mountains and north of the ohio river valley, not about south states wanting their slaves back.
    The bill of rights was not originally in the constitution.

  8. Ethan

    On November 3, 2009 at 12:08 am


    Pretty good but some inaccuracies :)

  9. godman

    On March 11, 2010 at 10:38 pm


    nothing helpful at all..whose website is this..too much be specific duuuude!!!

  10. bullet head

    On March 11, 2010 at 10:45 pm


    yo kidnapping is never legal,,what do u mean by illegal kidnapping like there is also legal kidnapping did ya get high school diploma before creating website…go back to 11 grade please

  11. bob

    On June 4, 2011 at 4:22 pm


    the three fifths compromise (not clause) was actually that only three fifths of a states slave population would count when determining amount of votes, it had nothing to do with kidnapping. also, it was made AFTER the constitution

Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond