You are here: Home » Government » The Canadian Taxpayer’s Federation Comes Out Against EI After an Abortion, Regardless of Cause

The Canadian Taxpayer’s Federation Comes Out Against EI After an Abortion, Regardless of Cause

While I have often been a fan of the Canadian Taxpayer’s Federation, they have posted an article suggesting that they have no understanding of any of the issues on this subject other than that they want to save money.

I was surfing the web a bit today and came across an article from the “Canadian Taxpayer’s Federation” claiming that women were getting employment insurance (EI) for having abortions and called the assertion that “abortion being a private matter between a woman and her doctor” a “a clever jingle, but not entirely true”.

Interestingly, theirs is also “a clever jingle, but not entirely true”.  Since my wife recently had a miscarriage, I have learned a lot about miscarriage and why women should get EI while they are recovering from it.  After going to group meetings and listening to a lot of people’s stories, all I can say is that what is officially termed an abortion is often not that simple.  Here are a few examples:
– the surgery that my wife had was termed an abortion.  Our son had been dead for weeks and it was definitely not by our choice.  At that point, he had to be removed for my wife’s health, but we would do anything to have him back.  My wife was on EI while she worked through the grief of losing our baby.
– I know of several women who had abortions because the baby could not live.  These were usually missing key organs (i.e. the brain) and not developing in a manor deemed “compatible with life”.  This was definitely not a casual decision for these families and they are left dealing with a lot of pain from the decision even in cases where there was no doubt that the baby would not have lived.

These are not unwanted babies, but rather much loved babies who have either died in the womb or just would not have survived if they were born.

Now, after these women have lost everything (and yes, it really does feel that way when you go through it), the Canadian Taxpayers Federation wants them back at work on Monday so that they can sit on their high horse and save a few dollars.

This rule also allows for cases like a woman who conceives a baby from rape and has to have an abortion to take a few weeks off to recover.

While I totally understand not wasting my taxpayer money, and I am totally against getting EI if you don’t really need it or the rare case where someone just got pregnant causally and casually decided to have an abortion, all I can say to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is have a heart, and grab a brain!  Of the people that I have met through my ordeal none of them have abused EI and all of them have needed some time to work though the pain of the worst loss of their life.  Yes, I realize that there are opportunities for abuse but since you still need to get a doctor to sign off on the time off, I would say that the risk of abuse is worth it when you consider the very real problems that this rule is trying to address.

An interesting note:  In the interest of fairness, I tried to find a way to send the Canadian Taxpayers Federation a comment on their article, but they do not allow comments on their posts.  I did email them, but I never got any response.  Apparently they feel that taxpayers are not worth dealing with…

12
Liked it
User Comments
  1. Paula Mitchell Bentley

    On November 10, 2008 at 11:27 am


    Thanks for always being by my side hon. You’re the best husband and I appreciate you always.
    I think part of the problem is the terminology used — for example, when our son Kye passed in utero and was not miscarried “naturally”, it is called a missed abortion. This is anything but an abortion. I think that the whole medical terminology has to change as well as people’s perceptions and judgments. After all, you can’t judge until you’ve walked that mile, right?

  2. joystick7

    On November 17, 2008 at 6:55 am


    Nice article!

  3. T G Houle

    On November 17, 2008 at 2:35 pm


    How upsetting that people still have such a wrong view of abortion issues. I hope your article opens some eyes.

  4. psychobutterfly

    On December 15, 2008 at 9:49 am


    nice article!!

  5. Annia

    On February 4, 2010 at 5:34 am


    I think that if a woman chooses to have an abortion that is her decision. Who are you to point the finger and decide that their grief does not constitute legite EI? You have no right to judge , you don\’t know why the woman is doing it and really it is none of your business. You are not the one taking on the stress and grief of having to deal with that for the rest of your life. Regardless of what the situation is for the abortion it is not an easy one for any women. So who are you to judge?

Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond