Tyranny, Injustice, Corruption, Oppression, and Statism

[The author of this article has, also, posted words regarding the known reciprocal natures of the welfare state and the warfare state needing each other to properly and functionally survive in a kind of politically symbiotic relationship.]

Because the conservative thinking of Levin, Limbaugh, and such others gets willingly accepted as the kind of politically rightwing thinking and cognate action that is (wrongly) assumed to be needed, another temporary fix will be made, as had been true with, e.g., Reagan or as in 1994, which was cited above for the reader’s edification. 

Of equal consideration and weight, Levin, Limbaugh, and many others who intimately support their particular point of view greatly revere the memory and achievements of Abraham Lincoln; they do not believe any negative contrary facts about the Great Emancipator, as are detailed in such greatly historically revealing books as: The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War by Thomas J. DiLorenzo.

The Lincolnian “defense” of the Union had wrongly destroyed the former fully federalist basis of the pre-war Constitution with its decentralized and non-consolidated State as being the same as the nation itself, meaning an ideologically consolidated, European-style nation-state; this is in terms of crushing any real meaning to the political doctrine of states-rights and the changing of a reified federalism into a mainly centralized-state-oriented situation; this is by which the several states have become, increasingly, mainly ciphers for the national consolidated government in Washington, DC. 

All this worship of Lincoln and the harmful consequences of the Federal, the Union, forces’ absolute victory, in the war to crush the attempt to freely establish a free Southern Confederacy, vitiates, ruins, enormously the highly-warped conservative understanding of true political liberty and American political history as well.  

These inherently flawed conceptions, on the part of these old liberals/conservatives, lead then inevitably to the inability to follow right principles that can suitably sustain the proper revival of civic freedom and civil social liberty in this nation; thus, political victories, as a result, will be relatively fleeting or mainly impermanent exercises in repeated frustration, either every so many or few years, between national elections.  Big Government, as it is popularly referred to in America, just keeps on growing, regardless of which of the two major political parties gets into power, because both are dominated by liberals.

Therefore, the old liberals will, as per usual, get their minor but yet passing victory, while the new liberals will have the usual complete satisfaction in, thus, quite correctly knowing that the welfare-warfare state will insure that the newer levels of collectivism will be established and even more deeply— by the old liberals/ conservatives.  One readily sees here, so extremely clearly, the effective, modernist-oriented Hegelian effect of the thesis, antithesis, and the resulting synthesis, in this case, of keeping an establishmentarian socialism in place, generation after generation.

 And, this is obviously why the traditionalist right opposes conservatism so adamantly because, through this noted Hegelian effect, it is, in fact, really worse than collectivism itself— since it, absurdly, claims to be politically on the right, which is always a great lie.  The direction toward Big Government will not actually be significantly halted or changed, therefore, until these two groups of liberals are prevented from determining the course of American political history. 

Because, as Malcolm Muggeridge had wisely recognized, people, especially the elites, wish to think that they can live without assuming God does exist, Europe, e.g., is becoming a mere geographic expression as it is, consequently, becoming further depopulated of the once native Europeans.  The extremely arrogant presumption that there is no Supreme Being of the universe empirically insures that fewer people will, in fact, exist on earth; God, of course, can live without people, people cannot live without God. 

Postmodern tyranny’s greatest evil is, thus, seen in the demographic disaster of countries being depopulated of their once predominant populations.