You are here: Home » History » Horrific, Macabre, Artistic, and Fascinating Skulls Etc.

Horrific, Macabre, Artistic, and Fascinating Skulls Etc.

A short compendium of skulls and thoughts on scrimshaw. Empyrean and revered to nightmarish and profane, images of skulls sure to send shivers down your spine.

A somewhat dependable quick test for ‘reproduction’ or ‘faux’ scrimshaw is to take a red-hot needle with pliers and try to force it into a discreet section of the tusk. If it penetrates, it is probably (very likely) plastic or resin. A reproduction, fake. If it does NOT penetrate, it is/might be, real tusk or tooth material. Usually, only genuine tooth or bone can withstand the penetration of a red-hot needle. Made-made materials made after circa 1979 (plastics, resins, etc.) have been formulated to be harder, denser and do not necessarily hold-up to the ‘hot pin test’ anymore. So, an expert appraiser should be used if in serious doubt of any scrim’s authenticity. A genuine scrimshaw walrus tooth might go on auction for $600-900.00 or more. I think my friend paid $50.00 for his ’scrimshaw’ artifact so had it been real, it would have been a major windfall profit. At any rate, I would have still paid $50.00 for even knowing that is was a reproduction piece. It is that amazing!

Genuine scrims were made by first soaking the tusk or tooth in brine to soften it. Then, it was scraped with a knife and hand-sanded with sharkskin to obtain a clean surface. New and prepared tusk or tooth is fairly soft but hardens with age. An image from a poster or magazine would be drawn on the scrim in pencil and using a sharp nail or knife, the design would be etched and carved. The scrim hardens and yellows with age. No attempt should be made to ‘clean’ a scrim as this can remove the tobacco, tar or whatever ‘patina’ was applied to stain the work and make the art carving darker. Natural cracks appear with great age. There are of course in addition to honest reproductions meant as novelty keepsakes, fakes and forgeries. If the scrim art is not as deep as the natural cracks, then the art was carved-on more recently as the cracks were already present. Again, a professional appraiser’s opinion would need to be invoked. Legal restrictions and considerations regarding the buying or selling of antique scrimshaw exist.

As you might guess, -I would love to have a (legally obtained, permissible to own) sperm whale tooth or walrus tusk suitable to carve. Or, a thick-boned black or grizzly bear skull. I would ‘detail’ it similarly to that leather mask featured earlier, only, instead of using sharpened carpenter’s nails or knives I would use precision rotary tools like what I use on my rock/stone-carving projects. *Sigh…*

Why So Serious Silly?

Image Source

A rhino skull. It looks like a silly smirk on it’s bony mug, no? No much room for gray-matter in there.

Skull Rock

Image source

Skull Rock at Joshua Tree National Park, California. Realistic-looking, possibly a bit of the-hand-of-man was involved here? I can’t say, I’ve never been there. This looks very good though. -Here’s stick in yer eye, matey!

Probably an Elephant Skull

Image Source

That ‘hole’ in the center that looks as if it was meant for one large, central eye is probably where the trunk of the elephant attaches and is the sinus cavity, not an eye-socket. Those two vertical fluted chambers in front might be from where the tusks emanate. The top flatness and square overall shape of the skull does suggest an elephant.

Or, it could be a Cyclops? Your guess is as good as mine.

45
Liked it
User Comments
  1. James DeVere

    On January 11, 2009 at 3:41 am


    Interesting read but I was wondering,

    “I’d rather be dead and buried in New Orleans than alive and living just about anywhere else.” Who wrote this, where did this opinion originate from?

    Also, other ideas like, “The Inca practiced ritual skull malformation. This was accomplished by the binding of the head with wraps to encourage growth in an unnatural way by preventing expansion in another.” Is this part of your in-depth original research as an archeologist of some repute?

    and, “Because of the geographical position of Hallstatt (narrowly built between a mountain and a lake) there is little place for cemeteries. Thus, every ten years the bones of the deceased and buried used to be exhumed, labeled and placed into an ossuary to make room for new burials.” Expertise in geography and history…who’s expertise?

    Wonderful insights but from where do they come? I’d be a bit annoyed if my opinions were lifted for your article.

    Interesting information but which text, author and source is it all from ? j

  2. thestickman

    On January 11, 2009 at 6:02 am


    Obsess much do ya? :-( I’m going to leave your comment here, for awhile anyway, because I respect your opinion but I grow weary of your harass. And don’t worry, I don’t intend to ‘lift’ your opinions. If my writing disturbs you so much I suggest that you remove my name from your ‘friends’ list and you won’t have to note every article I submit for publishing. -Sound fair enough? :)

  3. Lostash

    On January 11, 2009 at 6:40 am


    I enjoyed this Sticky. I wouldn’t worry about whatshisface either, you don’t have to be an expert to write an enjoyable piece! Some people should get a life!!

  4. R J Evans

    On January 11, 2009 at 6:52 am


    Hear hear. I had a strange comment from James wondering where the bibliography was for two of my recent articles…. hmmm.

    Anyway, loved this one… blogged it too (hope you don’t mind!)

    http://www.webphemera.com/2009/01/horrific-macabre-artistic-and.html

    Thanks again for a great read!

  5. thestickman

    On January 11, 2009 at 7:09 am


    You too, eh? I was considering asking Triond if there was some way to pacify this notable writer (he has many articles, -I have read them and even submitted a few to social sites.) I was starting to feel singled-out. Now I feel better about just maybe ignoring comments a little bit more.. :)

    Thanks all (including you too, James.) :)

    -thestickman

  6. Alexa Anderson

    On January 11, 2009 at 8:18 am


    Oh my gosh…now that’s an interesting read…especially the head binding. Glad that’s not in fashion!

  7. Sotiris

    On January 11, 2009 at 8:28 am


    Nice skull article :D

  8. RJ Thomas

    On January 11, 2009 at 11:00 am


    Nice! Creepy, but cool :-D Skulls never fail to fascinate, especially those encrusted in diamonds (beat that bling, fiddy!)

    As to our friend James, you’re not the only target. He’s in the forums as well, and is apparently on a crusade to promote bibliographical accuracy and intense liturgical analysis. If I had to guess, I would say he’s an academic whose work was ripped off :-D

    While I’m all for bibliography in its place (that is, on Wikipedia, anything for Columbia University Press, etc. etc.) who obsesses about citations for your everyday Triond article?

    This is not an inquisition, its light reading. Calm down!

  9. lindalulu

    On January 11, 2009 at 1:03 pm


    Very interesting article Stickman,enjoyed the read.

  10. Lauren Axelrod

    On January 11, 2009 at 1:31 pm


    The Chichen Itza Skull Wall is my favorite. Cool piece!

  11. thestickman

    On January 11, 2009 at 2:23 pm


    I like Chichen Itza stuff too. Can hardly believe that my wife & I climbed all over that place. Good thing, timing-wise. The pyramid we climbed is no longer permitted for tourist to go up… a San Diego woman fell and rolled to bottom, died of injuries so, not permitted now. Will soon be writing this one up… :)

  12. Michele Cameron Drew

    On January 12, 2009 at 6:07 am


    Creepy and cool is right, great job stickman… dugg it.

  13. Paula Mitchell Bentley

    On January 12, 2009 at 8:05 am


    I loved the diamond skull. These are fascinating and creepy at the same time. Like a bad car accident that you drive by slowly and can’t help but look at. Great read!
    As for Professor fussypants, I’d just ignore it. You’re not writing an encyclopedia.

  14. Maria Blazz

    On January 12, 2009 at 7:46 pm


    Interesting piece about a fascinating subject.
    Regarding the bibliography, usually I like to know the sources of the information (I’m a journalist and I’m used to do that) but I would have suggested my inquiry in a gentler way. As others said, this is not an encyclopedia nor even a newspaper and I understand most of the people write here just for fun or other reasons.

  15. Geri Ohara

    On January 13, 2009 at 10:20 am


    Ohh my god! This gave me the creeps & send shudders down my spine..Brilliant article

  16. Lee Altman

    On January 13, 2009 at 2:53 pm


    This is awesome. I saw a documentary the other day on how so many of Londons building are built on bones from the bodies of the people that died from the black plague

  17. Poetic Angel

    On January 14, 2009 at 2:15 pm


    Very interesting article on skulls and pictures. That diamond skull is amazing! Thanks for sharing this information

  18. eddiego65

    On January 15, 2009 at 9:57 am


    This is really cool, through creepy. Excellent article as usual.

  19. denus

    On January 18, 2009 at 7:16 pm


    wow that was interesting.

    cheers,

    denus

  20. Bill M. Tracer

    On January 21, 2009 at 11:51 am


    An impressive collection of skulls. Cool article.

  21. Patrick Bernauw

    On January 22, 2009 at 12:57 pm


    I once was in a Greek chapel where they had all these skulls… and Louis de Bernières in one of his fine novels wrote about this tradition, and suddenly I was there again… and now, at last, I’m here to read your article… and yeah, there I go again! You did a really fine job, Stickman! Wonderful photographs and a well written article!

  22. QuinMonty86

    On January 23, 2009 at 11:05 am


    I decided to make your acquaintance and OMG. Cool and creepy together. Loved the history lesson, and the pics were good, too. I’ve never seen a hippo skull, either. Very interesting. No crystal skulls though. :( I’ll take the diamond one, instead. :)

Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond