You are here: Home » History » Kurdish Nationalism: 1830-1930

Kurdish Nationalism: 1830-1930

Kurdish national movements from the 19th century through the 1930s.

After living in Istanbul for some years, prince Mohammed was granted permission to return to his country. However, he was mysteriously murdered on his way home (most probably by the assassins of the Ottoman Sultan).

Amir Mohammed’s movement was different from all previous Kurdish attempts at freedom. It was for once a huge endeavor with a broad popular basis (at least in its initial stages). It is normal to conclude that this movement was the forerunner of Kurdish national movements. However, one problem which severely damaged the Amir’s cause was the social culture of the Kurdish people itself. Based on tribal and clan organization, unity and national belongingness were still strange, not to say altogether incomprehensible, to the Kurdish character. Amir Mohammed placed his bet on this sensitive issue. He lost because he did not realize that more time was needed in order to unify a tribal-pastoral society. Kurdistan was not yet ready to accept freedom and national sovereignty under the leadership of a single ruler.

The Soran district was a remote area in southern Kurdistan. Amir Mohammed was not able to establish ties with the Armenian vilayets. The only Christians which might have helped the Amir were Armenian and Nestorian villagers who had migrated long ago to these remote areas of Kurdistan. However, as will be related, Christian and Armenian aid was more readily available during the next Kurdish rebellion. The originator of the new movement was non other than Bedir Khan. The nexus of his revolt was his capital city, Jezireh.

Bedir Khan’s Rebellion

Bedir Khan, the Amir of Bohtan, was born in 1802. he was the son of the most prominent feudal lord of Bohtan, whose family enjoyed the leadership of the principality since the fourteenth century. Bedir Khan was destined to play an important role in the history of the Kurdish liberation movement.

Most of southern Kurdistan had by now suffered dearly at the hands of the Ottoman armies. Kurds had no doubts about the intentions of the Sultan. An apparent hatred toward the Ottoman regime was gaining momentum. On the other hand, Ottomans encountered a great defeat in Syria where their armies were defeated against the forces of Egypt’s viceroy, Mohammed Ali, at Nazib, in June 1839. (9) Bedir Khan acted quickly, and by 1840 he brought almost all of Ottoman Kurdistan under his rule. The prince of Bohtan also signed a treaty of friendship with the Kurdish leaders of Iran and the district of Kars.

6
Liked it
User Comments
  1. derek bucher

    On December 12, 2007 at 2:40 pm


    very helpfull!!!!!

  2. Jessica

    On December 16, 2007 at 2:05 pm


    The citations in this are extremely hard to follow. The numbers within the text are not consecutive and the endnote section is very confusing as well. In light of this, it is hard to believe that much of this is not completely plagiarized from safrastian and chaliand (as a stopped reading about page 5, as a result of the citation issues) or just partly untruth.

  3. GarabetMoumdjian

    On January 22, 2008 at 5:55 pm


    DEAR JESSICA:

    I AM THE AUTHOR OF THE PAPER UNDER QUESTION. I CAN SAY WITHOUT ANY HESITATION THAT THERE IS NO PLAGIARISM HERE. SAFRASTIAN, CHALIAND AND ALL OTHER SOURCES ARE GIVEN DUE RESPECT IN THE ENDNOTES. IT IS NOT MY PROBLEM THAT THE WORD(DOC) FILE I SENT THEM IS NOT SHOWING PROPERLY IN THE HTML FORMAT. SOMEONE AT THEIR END MUST BE RESPONSIBLE TO CORRECT THE CODES SO THAT THE PAPER AND THE ENDNOTES ARE DISPLAYED CORRECTLY. BESIDES, AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE RESEARCH IS DONE IN ARMENIAN PRIMARY SOURCES (NEWSPAPERS OF THE TIMES INCLUDED), ESPECIALLY WHAT CONCERNS THE 1925 (SAID’S) AND THE 1930 (ARARAT) KURDISH REBELIONS. THEREFORE, I INSIST THAT YOU REVIEW YOUR COMMENT IN THE LIGHT OF MY EXPLANATIONS.

Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond