Napoleon Bonaparte: Hero or Tyrant?
A few reasons to question whether or not Napoleon was a tyrant.
Napoleon Bonaparte is undoubtedly known as one of the most successful military and political leaders in history. His actions brought France out into the limelight and were an important factor in the shaping of European politics in the 19th century. He was looked upon by his enemies and many others as a tyrant, but to others he was a hero as he dominated Europe and increased France’s sphere of influence. He did this by establishing alliances and appointing friends and family to rule over other European countries. Whether or not Napoleon was a tyrant is almost beside the point when you look at the great things that he accomplished.
What was the situation in France before Napoleon took power in 1799? France had experienced the revolution in 1789 and had gone through several different types of government. France was changed, during the revolution, from a monarchy-governed state to a republic, to a revolutionary government to being ruled by the directory, a group of five men who were elected by a council. It was this government that Napoleon overthrew by plotting with members of the directory and his brother, who held the position of speaker in the Council of Five Hundred. The directory was overthrown and was replaced by the Consulate, with Napoleon running everything as First Consul. Five years after the overthrowing of the directory, Napoleon crowned himself Emperor of France, and the story has it that he seized the crown out of the hands of Pope Pius VII to avoid subjugation to the authority involved there – many of these acts have lead me personally to believe that his seizure of power was more tyrannical in nature than heroic.
Napoleon was a great general and a true master of stratagem; it was his strategies and tactics that allowed him to conquer most of Europe through a series of wars and battles. He was, more often than not, victorious, and his actions in battle were seemingly very heroic. Long before Napoleon was a general, he was a lowly artillery commander who battled in the siege of Toulon; it was his plan that led to the capture of the city. During the battle he was wounded in the thigh, and after his victory was promoted to the rank of Brigadier General. Many of his actions and decisions in battle could be viewed as tyrannical, such as his re-establishment of slavery in the French colonial territories. When his army was retreating from Russia, suffering from plague and cold, he had many of the sick men and stragglers poisoned to avoid them falling into the hands of the Russians. It may have been a sacrifice for his country, but he was still killing off his own men to avoid them getting captured, which is, presumably, the act of a tyrant. He was apparently ruthless, and it was this attribute combined with superior stratagem and strength of arms that allowed Napoleon to win so many battles.
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post CommentEleria
On May 20, 2010 at 10:00 pm
I agree that he was a great man, very intelligent. He was also somewhat Atheistic. Good for him!
Lex!e
On August 30, 2010 at 5:42 pm
Are you kidding me he might have been a smart man. But he is a tyrant! Definitley!
DumbAuthor
On January 28, 2011 at 6:43 am
Stupid article, author knows nothing about Napoleon and shouldn’t have bothered writing about him.
What?
On January 28, 2011 at 6:44 am
I’d expect to read something like this from a 6th grade history student. Poorly written without any knowledge on the subject.
lulu
On February 14, 2011 at 12:37 pm
i like the bird……. now he is gone….. BRING HIM BACK!!!!!!!!!…….. i named him george….i love george…
lulu
On February 14, 2011 at 12:37 pm
i like the little yellow bird……. now he is gone….. BRING HIM BACK!!!!!!!!!…….. i named him george….i love george…
hey
On January 31, 2012 at 4:41 pm
hey