Six Anti-american Myths
The truth is that, for all its flaws, America is a great nation. There are much more anti-American myths. But this article just refutes six of them.
Many of these anti-American claims have come to be viewed as basic accepted fact in the minds of many people. For example, it is treated as accepted fact that when the US liberated Cuba from Spain, it wasn’t truly independent; but really under America’s economic control through its “vile” corporations. What’s not mentioned is that after Cuba got its independence, it thrived and prospered until the Castro brothers and the “heroic” Che destroyed Cuba after taking it over. The poverty is blamed on the American “embargo” even though it’s clearly caused by the policies of the Communist regime. What’s not mentioned is that the US is the top food supplier in Cuba. There is no way that the American “embargo” could actually impoverish Cuba that much. Pretty much, America can’t win. It does business with Cuba, and it has a monopoly on the whole island. It has an embargo, and it’s starving and impoverishing the island. Castro’s nationalizing of American corporations is portrayed by the revisionist anti-American propagandists as a justified move. The fact that Cubans have less food than Spanish slaves did when Cuba was under Spanish rule is not caused by the embargo, but by Castro’s food rationing policies [to see a chart of the amount, look at page 152 of Humberto Fontova's eye-opening book "Exposing the real Che Guevara and the Useful idiots who Idolize him"].
Castro declaring his country Communist is blamed on America. America is supposedly so bad that Castro had no choice but to declare himself a Communist and get aid from the Soviet Union. However, the truth is that the US brought Castro to power in the first place. America had an arms embargo on Batista, supported Fidel Castro’s movement, told Batista to leave and even was the first one to recognize Castro’s regime. Robert Reynolds, the CIA’s Caribbean desk on the Cuban revolution, boasted,”Me and my staff were all Fidelistas.”
Former US ambassador Earl T. Smith said,”We put Castro in power.”
He also said,”To make my point more clear, let me say that, we helped to overthrow the Batista dictatorship which was pro-American only to install the Castro dictatorship which is pro-Russian.”
The killings and torture of political opponents and those the Communist regime didn’t like gets whitewashed [if not denied or justified]. Castroite propagandists claim that those executed in La Cabana were some of Batista’s worst killers and torturers and that the tribunals were fair. They claim that there was “volumes” of testimony by their “victims”. Yet the evidence says otherwise. In reality, most of those executed in La Cabana were innocent people who had no connection to Batista. Some of them served in Castro’s July 26 movement in an attempt to bring democracy to Cuba, but only to be disappointed that Castro turned out to be another dictator. Even most of the executed victims who did not serve in that movement still had no connection to Batista.
The ones who did get a “tribunal” got sham tribunals, where the verdict was already decided before the “tribunal”.
Plus, Che Guevara said,”Judicial evidence is an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! We execute from revolutionary conviction.”
So out of revolutionary conviction, thousands of innocent men, women and children were shot. La Cabana showed what a stupid cowardly dufus Che was. Every object witness [not the Castroite propagandists] who saw what happened at La Cabana expressed their disgust on what the Communist regime through Che did there.
The revisionist anti-American leftists say that, though there were executions in La Cabana, the killing of political prisoners stopped. However, though La Cabana is no longer an execution site, political opponents are still killed and tortured by the Communist regime. And there are still labor camps where people disliked by the Castro brothers are tortured.
In the conclusion, I refuted some more of the revisionist anti-American leftist propaganda. The truth is that, for all its flaws, America is a great nation. There are much more anti-American myths. This article just refuted six of them.
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post CommentEhsan
On January 16, 2010 at 12:16 am
So many experts tell a completely different version of the 53 coup, are they all dumber than you? The CIA is lying?
http://www.mohammadmossadegh.com/1953/
Benyamin Solomon
On February 3, 2010 at 12:48 am
I see you go on to a propaganda site for Mossadegh [it also acts like a propaganda site for the Iranian regime and even denies that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for wiping Israel off the map] in order to cite your “proof” Who are these “experts”? The answer is that they’re anti-American propagandists. The anti-American narrative has become the dominant narrative. I told what happened from a truthful perspective. Try going onto the following page below to know some more of the full story: http://helian.net/blog/2009/06/26/history/mossadegh-iran-and-the-cias-electric-kool-aid-acid-coup/
No one even refuted the claims about Mossadegh’s emergency powers or his rigged referendum. Instead, the Mossadegh was a democratic hero propagandists keep on going on and on with their story of heroic popular democratic Mossadegh against the evil west. Face it. Khomeini, the founding father of the Iranian regime, hated Mossadegh and stated that Mossadegh staying in power would’ve slapped Islam. So clearly, the Iranian regime doesn’t like Mossadegh and is using him as an excuse in order to distract people [especially the west and America] from the real picture and to make it seem like the west, especially the “Great Satan” deserves all of the blame. After all, those heroic Iranian people on the streets are fighting to free their country from the Iranian regime and its oppression and aren’t fighting against America or the west. The Iranian regime needs the Mossadegh fairy tale in order to distract the world from the true picture about what’s going on in Iran. Whether knowingly or not, these liberals [like Stephan Kinzer] who repeat over and over again are actually aiding the Iranian regime. It’s also used by the Iranian regime in order to portray their nuclear weapons program in the same heroic light that Mossadegh’s nationalizing of the AIOC was portrayed. This anti-American narrative [the usual blame America for everything] has even got our own politicians buying into it; first Madeline Albright, then Ron Paul and then Barack Obama in his Cairo speech. As I said, these “experts” help the Iranian regime whether knowingly or not by giving them this anti-American fairytale on a silver platter.
vida
On May 4, 2010 at 8:26 am
When did Abraham Lincoln own slaves? You do know that slave owner ship was never the norm in America? This is why it was first outlawed in the north and then a war was fought to end it in the south. It’s funny what truths you can find if you dig deep into accurate history. There were even several free blacks in the south who owned slaves. And while slavery in America ended in 1865, other places in the world seem practice slavery.
mike
On May 27, 2010 at 5:45 pm
wow, i bet even God is an American!!! God bless America!!! lol
Benyamin Solomon
On August 18, 2010 at 3:28 am
When, on page 2 of the article, I said hatrhateed, I meant hatred. Sorry for the typo there.
the Baron
On October 29, 2010 at 4:52 pm
Isn’t this lifted from Michael Medved’s book, “The Ten Biggest Lies About America”? Not I don’t agree with the points, but if credit is due, it should be noted. Otherwise, it’s dangerously close to plagiarism.
Benyamin Solomon
On October 30, 2010 at 3:33 am
How is this plagerism from Michael Medved’s book? Did I look at his book and copy a phrase? Having a myth.andfact formula is a common way of writing that many people use. I worked and wrote this article and am the one who deserves credit for it.
Wesley Mcgranor
On November 22, 2010 at 1:59 pm
The past counter-culture has had its way with the American System and is still deconstructing and revisioning as i type.
B.A. Gilmore
On April 12, 2011 at 10:59 pm
Yes, slavery ended but not the discrimination against African Americans. After reconstruction was the rise of the Ku Klux Klan who continued to terrorize the black community. Jim Crow laws were also instituted to keep black people “in their place”. African Americans had to fight for full rights in this country. Europe got the chance to see American democracy in action when they saw the pictures and news of African Americans being attacked by dogs and with water in the streets. Let’s not try to rewrite history. Those of us who saw it, still remember it.
Benyamin Solomon
On June 24, 2011 at 2:16 pm
Benyamin Solomon’s important note: Serbs were the victims of Islamo-Fascism and were simply defending themselves from Islamo-Fascists, who came to attack them. Bill Clinton intervening on behalf of Islamo-Fascists in Kosovo was one of the stupidest things that he ever did.