You are here: Home » History » The construction of the great pyramids

The construction of the great pyramids

A groundbreaking theory on the construction of the pyramids, exposing a mystery that has intruiged people for millennia. A remarkable new theory that sheds some light on the mystery of the construction of the great pyramids

The method of construction of the great pyramids is a question which remains shrouded in mystery. However, three historians named Erich von Daniken, Clifford Wilson, and Joseph Davidovits have devised theories which attempt to explain this wonder. The three theories are well developed; However, Davidovits’ theory explains many of the unanswered questions of the pyramids that the other two theories cannot account for. Despite all the strengths of Davidovits’ theory, it still has some flaws, including the question of whether or not the Egyptians actually had the technology to cast blocks from concrete. Daniken’s Theory, although explanatory of some of the mysteries that surround the pyramids, is based of the unprecedented event that extraterrestrials landed on earth. Most of Daniken’s evidence is either explainable or pure coincidence. The theory provided by Wilson is nearly as unlikely as Daniken’s due to the fact that Wilson’s theorized method of construction would require an amount of labour and that the Egyptians did not possess, as well as tools that they could not have created. Daniken’s and Wilson’s theories are clearly surpassed by Davidovits’ more explanatory and more probably version of events.

Although Davidovits’ theory evidently explains a more reasonable approach to the construction of the pyramids, it still has several flaws. The biggest of these flaws is the issue of whether the ancient Egyptians possessed the technology to create artificial stone. It seems unlikely that a people who lived 4500 years ago would have mastered the skills necessary to produce a 6 500 000 ton monument from artificial stones. Even if they did have this capability, it seems less likely that they would be able to mass produce the blocks on the scale required to build the pyramids. Nonetheless, Davidovits counters this argument by theorizing that the Egyptians could produce the blocks through alchemy. Davidovits states that the Egyptians were advanced enough in the art of alchemy to perform the mummification process, therefore it is also possible that they were scientifically advanced enough to create concrete. Furthermore, the Egyptians worshipped a god named Khnum, whose worship was related to alchemical stone making. “During the old kingdom, the prestige of the god Khnum, the divine potter who was one of the creators of the universe, reached its peak.” (Davidovits, J., 4) Is it a coincidence that the Egyptians devoutly worshipped a god associated with artificial stone making during the time period when they built the great pyramids? Although it is not known for certain whether the Egyptians were capable of making concrete, Davidovits’ theory highlights some evidence which strongly suggests they possessed this technology.

2
Liked it
User Comments
  1. Paul Hai

    On November 11, 2008 at 5:40 am


    In August 2006 Rampless Egyptian Pyramid construction emerged from Australia. Ramps are not mentioned in ancient Egyptian historical records but wooden machines are.
    Visit http://www.haitheory.com

  2. Paul Hai

    On December 26, 2009 at 7:05 am


    Rampless Egyptian Pyramid construction has a definite AUSTRALIAN connection.

    Captain Matthew Flinders navigated and mapped Australia’s coastline. His grandson became Professor Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie who excavated ancient Egyptian artifacts. In 1895 as an employee of the Egypt Exploration Fund (now Society) of London he was excavating artifacts at Deir el-Bahari and found a cache of ancient building equipment buried for preservation in a hewn out rock pit during Pharaonic times.

    One of the wooden items is stated as being of “unidentified use” and has been named the “Petrie rocker” by Egyptologists.

    Petrie considered the “rocker” was used to raise Pyramid blocks with a “rocking” motion and in 2006 he has been proven partly correct on the matter of raising Pyramid blocks using “rockers”.

    The “rocker” is a component of an ancient Egyptian pulley which operates with a mechanical advantage of 2.8 and with CLASS 2 lever principle as a wheelbarrow does. (CLASS 2 lever: Pivot – Load – Effort).

    The technical term for the “Petrie rocker” is “pinion-pulley lobe quadrant”. Four of these surround a Pyramid block and then the pulley is hoisted causing rotation and positive engagements of pulley lobes with Pyramid steps.

    Consider the Pyramid as four RACKS of stone teeth on to which the PINION pulley lobes engage and here is the earliest form of RACK & PINION mechanics that we know of.

    This is the ancient method of Pyramid construction as used on at least four large Pyramids: Sneferu’s RED Pyramid and those at Giza of Khufu, Khafre and Menkaure.

    This ancient method of construction DOES NOT REQUIRE RAMPS and uses the Pyramid under construction (using all four sides simultaneously) to complete the Pyramid, thus using a Pyramid to build a Pyramid.

    Petrie died in Jerusalem in 1942 unknowing that “Petrie rockers” are components of an ancient pulley, unlike any pulley in the modern world, and his most important excavation.

  3. Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez Varona

    On April 22, 2010 at 9:47 am


    Hello:

    I am the author of the new hypothesis of Giza pyramids construction’s theory. I would like to know the opinion that you could have of my work:
    http://crvcrv21-newhypothesisofgizeh.blogspot.com

    Also, I would like to invite all of you to my exposition of it on next IV Iberian Egyptology Congress, to be hold on Lisbon in next September 13-17

    My best wishes to all of you.

    Carlos

Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond