<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Witch Craze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socyberty.com/history/the-witch-craze/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socyberty.com/history/the-witch-craze/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 01:40:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CaSundara</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/history/the-witch-craze/comment-page-1/#comment-176432</link>
		<dc:creator>CaSundara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/history/the-witch-craze/#comment-176432</guid>
		<description>P.S. I stumbled it, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. I stumbled it, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaSundara</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/history/the-witch-craze/comment-page-1/#comment-176426</link>
		<dc:creator>CaSundara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/history/the-witch-craze/#comment-176426</guid>
		<description>I loved this article, Kim. I&#039;ll blog this later on. I happen to be writing a very similar one right now (I was just learning how to use Office OneNote to store research etc, or it might have been published the same day!), so I&#039;ll have to change my stance slightly now, to make it less similar.
I&#039;m still laughing about this bit &quot;Women it was said were vulnerable to Satan and prone to witchcraft. They are unreliable and mercurial creatures, weak, distracted by vanities, and superstitious; they are naturally spiteful; they are more concerned with matters of the flesh than men, and they use sex to cast a spell over men so they can do the Devil’s work.&quot;
And I was going to write about the drowning bit, too - can anyone even believe that&#039;s the way they did it? The innocent will drown? I beggars belief...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved this article, Kim. I&#8217;ll blog this later on. I happen to be writing a very similar one right now (I was just learning how to use Office OneNote to store research etc, or it might have been published the same day!), so I&#8217;ll have to change my stance slightly now, to make it less similar.<br />
I&#8217;m still laughing about this bit &#8220;Women it was said were vulnerable to Satan and prone to witchcraft. They are unreliable and mercurial creatures, weak, distracted by vanities, and superstitious; they are naturally spiteful; they are more concerned with matters of the flesh than men, and they use sex to cast a spell over men so they can do the Devil’s work.&#8221;<br />
And I was going to write about the drowning bit, too &#8211; can anyone even believe that&#8217;s the way they did it? The innocent will drown? I beggars belief&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

