What Did the Romans Ever Do for Us?
A fun reassessment of the Roman Empire’s contribution to the modern world. Were they that great or was it all just propaganda?
Let’s look at that in contrast with the rest of the world at the time. The Greeks preferred athletics and witty theatrical productions, busying themselves with art, mathematics and philosophy. We even have an amazing clockwork planetarium dating to the late Classical period, the likes of which wouldn’t be seen again for thousands of years. Okay so Greek men were rather keen on rowdy drinking parties and pretty young boys, but these were past times that didn’t involve people getting killed! Although the Romans were quite keen on some of the Greeks’ artworks, a lot of them only survive through Roman copies, but this interest meant a lot of statues were moved from their original home and lost, including priceless works like the chryselephantine (ivory and gold) statue of Athena from the Parthenon at Athens. The Parthians were a similarly arty bunch. They loved poetry and ornate costumes and were one of the most tolerant of societies of the time, allowing conquered nations to continue their customs, costumes and languages. We have cultures like Greece and Parthia to thank for a myriad of useful things, from safety-pins to trigonometry, from parasols to the alphabet. They even knew that the Earth went around the sun! But it wasn’t just the east that was civilised: the Vandals were very keen on poetry, the Goths liked intricate gold jewellery, the Gauls even allowed equal rights for men and women. So much for “civilised” Rome against the barbarians!
Image via Wikipedia
So What DID the Romans Do For Us?
Even the most revisionist historian has to give the Roman world quite a lot of credit, because despite not really being that different to the rest of the ancient world and certainly not being as great as they liked to think, they were pretty darn clever. We have enormous olive presses, some with beams the size of trees others using an ingenious screw technique, with channels and vats designed to strain off the unwanted material like amurca and seeds. They designed special carts which would not only cut corn but thresh it, separating the grain from the stalks, the original “combine harvester”. They turned food production into an industry on a monumental scale. Those not-so-useful aqueducts were also masterworks of engineering, carefully planned using gravity to draw water from the source to the city, where the channel would be separated and distributed by special water towers known as “castella”. Their roads too were admittedly far longer-lasting than their wooden Gaulish predecessors.
But what we really have to thank Rome for is helping the knowledge from cultures like Greece, Parthia and the Celtic tribes to spread. Under the empire, trade routes became not only better established but better protected, thanks to Rome’s formidable army, allowing new ideas, and indeed rather old ones, to spread from India to Britain and everywhere in between. We mustn’t forget the importance of the army, not only to the structure and society of the Roman world, but also to the spread of knowledge. Soldiers learnt to read, some even to write and they learnt how to build roads, aqueducts and other imperially-funded projects. The Romans may not have invented many of the things we give them credit for, and they might not have been the great civilising influence that we’re told about in school, but they were very good at letting certain ideas travel.
Want to learn more about the ancient world? Check out my “Bluffers Guides” to ancient history. More will be added soon.
Liked it



-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post CommentRana Sinha
On May 24, 2009 at 3:09 am
Very good article with a revisionist view of history. The “winner” viewpoint of history prevails, though it is full of intentional distortions and we sheepishly continue to accept what is taught at school.
Could the continuous glorification of imperial Rome come from a colonialist desire to portray the Roman version of the past as ultra civilized, so that colonialism and other selfish motives could be justified?
chris73
On May 24, 2009 at 5:35 am
Very informative and interesting but for those who know just a little about the Romams all these must not be a surprize.Romans where great in propaganda and people must not forget among others how Romans continously claimed Carthaginians where barbarians etc, the same time that this civilization ruled the western Medeteranian 8 centuries before Romans, when Rome was a tiny village.As far as i know (please correct me if i am wrong)Carthaginians developed drawings and instuctions about prefab boats. That gave them the opportiunity to rule western medeteranian but after this same inovation became a curse for them as Romans found these drawings and by the same way built their great navy fleet which used against the Carthaginians.
As a conclusion the greatness of Romans was exactly that ability they had to absorb and use and sometimes develop the knowledge of other civilizations mostly on engineering.
postpunkpixie
On May 24, 2009 at 10:44 am
Chris, I don’t know much about the Punic civilisation other than the ground plan of Carthage, since my studies don’t take me to that part of the world at that time. I’m more interested in the eastern Mediterranean until the Imperial period. As for Roman engineering, it really wasn’t that different. All they did was to do things on a larger scale. I’m more impressed by their agricultural innovations, personally. Far more useful, far more ingenious.
Rana, there may be something in that. Though I think to some extent it’s just that we don’t know that much about a lot of the other cultures at the time. I mean, look at the Celts or the Huns, we know hardly anything about them.
If I’m honest, this sort of thing isn’t the part of Roman history that most interests me, I just thought it’d be a fun article!
Karen Gross
On May 24, 2009 at 12:52 pm
Great article, well written. I don’t think you mentioned the infamous Pax Romana – 200 years of peace enforced by those famous Roman soldiers.
We Christians also have those Roman roads to thank for the early spread of Christianity.
Joie Schmidt
On May 24, 2009 at 5:13 pm
I know very little about history – - so this article was quite eye-opening – - thank you for sharing it!
Blessings.
Sincerely,
-Liane Schmidt.
Kate Smedley
On May 26, 2009 at 4:24 am
Great article, good info and like the pics.. Also reminded me of a line out of Monty Python’s Life of Brian!
Nathan G
On May 28, 2009 at 8:24 am
cheers for setting the record straight. I thought it was rthe romans who did roads on concrete but knew that people would have had to bathe before them.
sexyhood03
On May 29, 2009 at 6:26 pm
very smart and informative i liked it!
Daium
On May 30, 2009 at 11:30 pm
nice!!!
CaSundara
On August 21, 2009 at 8:10 pm
Very interesting. I’m about to begin an ancient history and classical civilisation course so this is very relevant and also enjoyable to read. Thanks for sharing!
DAZJA
On October 21, 2009 at 1:46 am
YEA iM NT THE GEEKY TYPE OR THE TYPE OF PERSON THAT LiKES RESEARCHiNG BUT THiS LiL ARTiCLE WAS SO DOWN TO EARTH N WORDS && REALLY BROKE iT DOWN FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND. iT LUK LiK DEY WANTD TA CUSS N A FEW SENTENCES
Jason
On September 21, 2010 at 6:26 pm
You realy should do some reasearch before you write an ariticle. The Romans started building roads in 509 BC during the rise of the Roman Republic. The Romans didnt invade Gaul until almost 450 years later during the Gaulic wars starting in 58 BC. (Roman Republic is not the same as the Roman Empire)
postpunkpixie
On September 22, 2010 at 8:22 am
Jason, I have a degree in Classical Archaeology and Ancient History from Oxford, I know the difference between the Republic and the Empire, sweetie.
Try reading an article properly next time; I don’t mention any date for the invasion of Gaul or when the Romans started building roads, I was looking instead at the pre-existing Gaulish road network (dating from the Bronze Age). The focus of the article is the things that “barbarian” civilisations had achieved that the Romans took credit for. If you’d actually read the paragraph instead of skimming it, you’d realise this.
phil
On October 1, 2010 at 5:56 pm
Why dont you tell every body about the byzantine empire and how successful it was before you go talking crud about things you have no idea about.The Romans were a great civilization with a few errors here and there but they were definitely a civilization to remember and appreciate. Im going to guess you dont take baths or have hygiene since your practically against the creation
postpunkpixie
On October 3, 2010 at 7:13 pm
Phil, you’re yet another person I have to tell to read the article properly. I’m not saying that Rome wasn’t a great civilisation, it simply wasn’t as innovative as people think.
Please READ the article: the Roman baths were decidedly unhygenic and they certainly didn’t “create” hygiene (in fact the very word “hygiene” is Greek; it was the name of a goddess).
You also show your ignorance of history: the Byzantine empire postdates Rome and rose from the remains of the Eastern Roman empire much later. My expertise lies in earlier periods (Bronze Age to Iron Age Europe), I know a lot more about early Imperial Rome than I do about the Byzantine period.
I’m amazed by the number of very rude and reactionary comments this article is recieving. Is revisionist history that hard for you to swallow?