Comments on: Why did Germany lose World War One?

By: Chase Unfried

Chase Unfried — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:28:02 +0000

“However, Germany’s Schlieffen plan completely failed”
Considering the fact that they never fully executed the original Schlieffen plan and the general acting on it was a coward, and always doubted everything he did, until he fucked it up, yeah. The Schlieffen plan would’ve probably destroyed what chance France had. Oh, and the French sucked, like every war.

By: Denis DAVID MSANGAZI

Denis DAVID MSANGAZI — Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:40:02 +0000

nice answer…i give it 9/10

By: Jeff

Jeff — Sat, 23 Jul 2011 01:37:03 +0000

@delmar
I know you wrote your comment a few years ago, but the US (who entered the war in 1917) had little impact in actual battles compared to Britain, Canada, France, and Russia. When the US declared war, they needed 100 days to get to the European Front. The Germans knew this so they launched an offensive to through the Allies back into the sea. Canada (and elements of the British army) started a series of counter offensives which re-gained much land, and had a significant toll on the German armed forces on the Western Front, both in material and men. Saying US won WW1 and \’kicked ass\’ is ridiculous.

By: I am no expert

I am no expert — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:58:07 +0000

First of all, atleast the author had made an effort into writing this. I’m sure all you people criticizing this essay couldn’t do a better job. Though yes, I must agree that there are some main points missing, but it did give me some help when studying for my history exam. So, thank you

By: redburn

redburn — Sun, 24 Apr 2011 00:47:58 +0000

write an article about germany on ww2 and message me: my triond username is redburn

By: thechief

thechief — Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:16:02 +0000

okay to begin with germany didn’t just lose the war, many other nations got screwed! brittan and france lost almost an entire generation of men. another thing the u-boat campaign was brilliant( i am not German) it attack Britain on all fronts, the english tried everything and the depth charges were very inaccurate plus when the British were trying to get any supplies through to england they had to be accompanied by two battle ships simply because the submarines were brilliant in destroying ships

By: Brewchief

Brewchief — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 05:42:11 +0000

“yo”, you really shouldn’t be lashing out at anyone in defense of this “essay”. It is riddled with so many inaccuracies and so oversimplified that it is UTTERLY USELESS as a history resource. There are many great resources to learn about history. This is not one of them.

Try going to a library and cracking a book. The more the better, as you will find many opposing viewpoints and documentation of historical events.

By: Tom

Tom — Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:04:28 +0000

hmm… germany didn’t start the first world war, perhaps you should read your history books before writing an article about something you don’t really understand. This is the Internet, there might be some people who actually believe what you have written…

By: jasas

jasas — Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:03:43 +0000

i thought it was pretty good, but the grammatical errors confused me

By: Ann

Ann — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:47:31 +0000

thank you very much Paige, I find your information really helpful !