Wikileaks and The Bible
Everybody is in uproar about Wikileaks and its leaks, it seems. The question is: Why? Apart from the publicity stunt by someone called Hilary Clinton, the information disclosed is as interesting as the coming-out of Ricky Martin or England not being accorded the FIFA World Cup 2018.
Hilary Clinton did all she could that lay within her (considerable) power to hype up the expectations over the disclosures on Wikileaks. After the first part of these revelations is out, the only question I have is: How much was she paid for that free publicity?
What have Wikileaks revealed so far? The common theme of the leaks is that diplomats gossip. That is undoubtedly a major revelation and due to put lives at risk. Everybody hates gossip, or don’t they? Apart from that, there was the insight that diplomats are arrogant snobs (please take note that I left out ‘American’ on purpose, because the rule applies to all). But we knew that already; they leave their cars parked where they disrupt traffic the most because they never have to pay their fines; they use their diplomatic immunity to smuggle contraband; they are richly paid for their 24/7 jobs (in this case that’s 24 days in 7 years). American diplomats might be a bit more arrogant than others as they have to buy their posts, but otherwise anybody with a CD or CC number plate on their cars falls into that category.
There were the shattering revelations about what the diplomats said about other country leaders; calling French President Nicholas Sakozy an emperor without clothes amused me, but it’s just a candid and still very diplomatic assessment of a failure; Russia’s Putin is an Alpha dog (so what?); Italy’s Silvio Berlusconi takes bribes, but we all knew that already; and Switzerland is a frustrating Alpine republic. Yes it is, even for the people who live there and call it home.
I could continue in this vein for hours, I’m afraid. It’s Ricky Martin and FIFA all over; was there anybody who was really surprised at these ‘news’? I call the whole set-up a no-news-site. It was the same with the Iraq and Afghanistan revelations; there was nothing in there that wasn’t already known. Makes you wonder why the American government spends so much effort on promoting the site. What horrors must be lying in the cellar of Capitol Hill to go to such length in boring diversion?
Some newspapers tried to link the leak to Hilary Clinton (it is, after all, her department that was incontinent). But the revelations are so harmless the question arises why they were released? A security leak in the American government? You bet. The only smile I got out of that approach was the joke: “Embarrassed? Me? Mrs Bill Clinton?”
No, that was not the Bible part. The Bible comes in with Ecclesiastes 1,9. I’ll leave you to hunt it down yourself. You’ll know it when you see it.
Related articles
Wikileaks Internet Address Taken Down
Michael Posner: A Further Clueless American
The Real Guy Fawkes is a Woman (And American)
Offensive Political Correctness
Blair Affair, the Lies Continue
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
Post CommentUma Shankari
On December 4, 2010 at 12:16 pm
Interesting observations on the revelations.
clandestinef
On December 4, 2010 at 6:18 pm
Great work… Looking forward to read more from you again.
SharifaMcFarlane
On December 8, 2010 at 5:07 am
The verse is so apt. I guess every generation has their chance to see it.
J. Harrington
On December 15, 2010 at 7:32 am
Totally bogus article just like the one about the Nobel Peace Prize Committee being boycotted because the prize was awarded to Assange. Wrong!!
ROFLMA!
Interesting to read the comments, though. Obviously some people are easily influenced, and just willing to post compliments so their faces will be seen on the wide world web.
What a sad world we live in these days.
Lucas Dié
On December 15, 2010 at 7:41 am
@J. Harrington: indeed, it is a sad world where people leave their comments without reading the articles they comment on, or even worse: showiing off that they didn’t understand them