Women and the Witch-Hunt in Scotland
This is a review of an article written by Julian Goodare and his interest in exploring new facts about why witch-hunts were taking place in Scotland from the 1500s to the late 1700s. His research ultimately leads to a debate between thw witch hunts were in fact hunting witches or targeting women.
Julian Goodare’s article, Women and the Witch-Hunt in Scotland, is an article written in response to a book written by Christina Larner. According to Goodare, Larner’s book, Enemies of God: The Witch-Hunt in Scotland, pioneered modern scholarly works of witch-hunts.[1] Goodare gives a lot of credit to Larner and writes about how she covered every possible question about the witch-hunts that could be asked. He stated however, that Larner only focused on the demonic pact of witch craft because she felt that women were not singled out as witches because men were also accused.[2] These points of Larner’s work lead Goodare to write this article asking two questions. The first question being, why were witches women? According to Goodare, the answer to why witches were women, explains the witch hunt.[3] The second, what effect did the witch-hunts have on women in Scottish society? He also stated, the answer to this question will explain its significance for early modern Scotland.[4] Goodare organized this article by stating perceptional facts from people of the witch-hunt era and actual accounts of witches hunted along with his scholarly findings.
His introduction gives a basic background of previous scholarly work and the thoughts of historians of the early years. He compares his own beliefs without discrediting previous discoveries. With Larner not believing that women were targeting during witch-hunts, he stated that there were already feminist calling the witch-hunts a “hypocritical plot by men,” so Larner had taken another approach.[5] A debate, now, has been opened between Larner and Goodare and the article goes to not disprove Larner, but to give authentification to Goodare.
Goodare’s first section gave us a brief introduction to the history of the witch-hunts and introduced the readers to the key players of the plot. With witch-hunting lasting from 1550 to 1700, 85% of the supposed thousand people executed were women. These women were predominately poor and sometimes widowed, while their hunters were usually upper class men that in some form had some control of the local government. These men included sheriffs and peace officers, but most were part of a group called the Kirk Sessions. The Kirk sessions were the church’s parish committees. He also states that during this time, Scotland went through a series of crisis in which women’s role in society seemingly became that of a “scapegoat” for the problems they were encountering. [6]
Liked it


-
-
Post CommentHelloSiti
On July 20, 2009 at 12:34 pm
I interest to its title.
David Crerand
On July 20, 2009 at 2:14 pm
Well written and researched. Structurally sound but may assume the reader has greater familiarity with the subject then you’re likely to find. When one presents a thesis paper or book review to a class one can at least assume that the class is familiar with the subject matter due to the shared experience of having read the assigned material. In this case however, when one posts an article on the internet the author assumes that the readers will have access or possession of that shared knowledge, when in reality they may have just been caught up by an intriguing title and in fact are unable to understand your points or the depth of your research. (See above.)