You are here: Home » Issues » A Change We Can Believe in or Twisted Reality?

A Change We Can Believe in or Twisted Reality?

Senator Obama has more twists and turns in his change to believe in than a treacherous switch back mountain road. At times his circular talks remind me of a sneaky rattle snake coiled and ready to strike.

I grew up respecting the laws and those that enforced them; In 2004 I learned to despise the double talk lies of the attorneys and therefore to wait, watch and specifically to listen very closely watching all the while their body language, facial expressions, taking note of stuttering, length of time between a question asked and the answer given, eye contact or eye wanderings during such questions, etc. By doing this one can often tell when another is passionate about one subject or another.

While it is true Senator Obama did in fact tell a CNN reporter he reserved the right to change his mind during an interview at the end of his primaries just before he and Senator Clinton out smarted the press for a private meeting, one must wonder how many times a nominee for the President of the United States of America gets the luxury of doing so on the same subject matters.

In the beginning Senator Obama’s talks were centered on freedom of choices, equality of rights regardless of the Faith Based Community stands all the while proclaiming to be Christian based himself. Now he appeals to the Christian Communities with his intent to enlist their help to get more people involved in the “system based programs.” I have yet to hear Senator Obama speak on what he intended to do to help the Faith Based Communities! The “System Based Programs” are in place for reasons that have little to nothing to do with Christian views and beliefs!

I am convinced the “System Based Programs” are actually contrary to Faith Based Communities beliefs; Senator Obama would have us believe otherwise. Why is it then that the Child Protective Services will take Faith Based believers children permanently out of the homes with no hope for return but will return children back into drug and or alcohol related homes with abuses still happening inside the homes? Why it is District Attorneys and Attorneys are permitted and encouraged to lie, withhold evidence pertinent to a truth in a case and pressure their clients into signing papers they know they shouldn’t sign? Why it is the Surgeon General is permitted to change the true status of drug and alcohol addictions to a disease that is inherent in all their children when most families have addictive behaviors but all can be controlled with active willpower? Why is it Senator Hillary Clinton works for Children’s Rights (children’s rights being what a faithless home?) even to the inclusion of children voting but wont help the children that need the help the most (children sent back to parent(s) still in abusive situations)?

0
Liked it
User Comments Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond