<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abortion: The Argument No One Can Win</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socyberty.com/issues/abortion-the-argument-no-one-can-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socyberty.com/issues/abortion-the-argument-no-one-can-win/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:17:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ducroisjosef</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/issues/abortion-the-argument-no-one-can-win/comment-page-1/#comment-152391</link>
		<dc:creator>ducroisjosef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/issues/abortion-the-argument-no-one-can-win/#comment-152391</guid>
		<description>That was amazingly well written. It was an effective appeal to emotion, but not an effective argument for destroying human life. You speak of pro-life supporters not knowing when a group of cells becomes truly human. If they don&#039;t know then neither do you, it can be equally argued that this is potentially murdering a human life, as it is destroying a potential human life. I would have more respect for people who argue for abortion if they would say that they are comfortable with the idea of potentially killing babies if it means gaining such a degree of convenience. That would be intellectually honest, and could be argued against effectively. I for one think the conversation isn&#039;t over. You say otherwise, but you did write this, and amazingly well, once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was amazingly well written. It was an effective appeal to emotion, but not an effective argument for destroying human life. You speak of pro-life supporters not knowing when a group of cells becomes truly human. If they don&#8217;t know then neither do you, it can be equally argued that this is potentially murdering a human life, as it is destroying a potential human life. I would have more respect for people who argue for abortion if they would say that they are comfortable with the idea of potentially killing babies if it means gaining such a degree of convenience. That would be intellectually honest, and could be argued against effectively. I for one think the conversation isn&#8217;t over. You say otherwise, but you did write this, and amazingly well, once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

