Direct TV Takes a Taser to Commercial Ethics
Direct TV puts profits over sensibilities with taser commercial. What responsibilities to advertisers have in the marketplace?
Direct TV is developing a reputation for creative marketing. The hilarious “Opulence: I Has It”
commercial generates laughs with good taste at the expense of foreigners who need to enhance their American English skills. When the satellite television provider sets its sights on police officers, the result is not so funny.
Teasing about tasers is about half smart. Making police officers to look abusive pushes advertising ethics into fantasy land. Watch the commercial:
The lead officer is portrayed as insensitive, heartless, and evil-hearted. The accompanying officer appears clueless and lame. How sad that any business would seek shareholder gain by trashing public servants who put their lives on the line daily.
Fantasy football is portrayed as more important than civility. The marketer uses the tactic of surprise to create a humorous moment but the joke is not evident. A second attempt at humor is made when the victim’s leg flails out of control. The result is Direct TV digging themselves deeper into a hole.
This commercial reeks of shoddy script writing that reveals disconnectedness to the real world. Would anyone seriously buy their product based on this advertising?
A bigger question needs to be asked. Do advertisers have any responsibility to maintain ethical advertising practices, or does anything go?
I’m all for teasing in good fun but not tasing that borders on police brutality.
(Disclosure Note: I am a satisfied Direct TV customer.)
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
-
Post CommentKaren Gross
On November 24, 2010 at 12:26 am
It is good to hear from you again, Brian. This TV commercial is completely irresponsible. Unfortunately, there is a segment of the population for whom this type of advertising works, otherwise Direct TV would not be spending the money. Thanks for the share.
Eunice Tan
On November 24, 2010 at 3:21 am
Hello Brian, how have you been? The second video you put here is shocking rather than funny. Thanks for raising this issue.
papaleng
On November 24, 2010 at 5:41 am
Welcome back, Brian, and what a nice article you have offered us. you have quite a good argument presented but I guess, those advertizing think-tanks have a different perspective. .
Brian Daniel Stankich
On November 24, 2010 at 10:44 am
Thanks for the warm welcome, friends. Guess I’m not the only one seeing it this way. Brian
InkPost
On November 24, 2010 at 8:27 pm
Great article.
Raene Kaleinani
On December 1, 2010 at 1:58 pm
Good post!