You are here: Home » Issues » Illusion of Leadership

Illusion of Leadership

As the events surrounding the termination of Usala bib Laden begin to unfold, I find myself qurstioning why the media was so quick to bestow congratulations upon President Obama for his "courageous" decision.
Specifically, if a person effectively has no choice, then just how does one justify giving them credit for the action?

Dear
Friends;

Here we go again with the mainstream
liberal media amplifying President Obama’s every action into something that
makes him into decisive leader. I am sure most all Americans are glad to see
that our efforts to hunt down and kill Usama bin Laden have finally succeeded.
If nothing else it reflects a persistence and long term commitment to achieve a
goal that few in the world would have given us credit for. Most think of the
general American public as impatient and not having much of a stomach for a
really tough long fight (ex. Viet Nam).

Well we just told the world,
through our actions, that they were wrong. Furthermore, any terrorist
organizations who think they will escape our wrath now know that this line of
think is not valid.

However, I have two problems with
what I have witnessed in the aftermath of this great achievement.

First, I don’t like the celebration.
In my opinion, there is no cause to celebrate! It is not as if bin Laden’s death
actually marks the beginning or end of anything noteworthy except that he is
dead. I realize that those who lost loved ones either directly or indirectly as
a result of bin Laden may emotionally feel some benefit and there is also a
justifiable sense of pride that our intelligence and military may take. However,
celebrating in the streets like you home team just won a championship shows no
class!

Second, Obama did not have a hard
decision to make. He simply made the only decision he could possibly make. Let’s
look at President Obama’s options:

  1. Send in a drone
    with a bomb
    – Obama could not send in a drone
    with a large bomb because they had no proof that bin Laden was in the compound.
    Given that we were invading a sovereign country’s territory without their
    knowledge we would have made a tenuous public relations situation with
    Pakistan all but impossible.
    Furthermore, if the complex were destroyed sufficiently to ensure everyone
    inside was killed, we may never have been able to prove bin Laden was actually
    ever in the compound.

  2. Do
    nothing
    – intelligence is fluid and the
    information changes minute to minute as do people’s movements. It had taken us
    almost 10 years to identify bin Laden’s courier and track him movements. The
    slightest leak or accidental operational misstep could lead to tipping off bin
    Laden or his courier and he would have vanished – maybe forever. The fact that
    we thought we had him and didn’t do anything would have inevitably been leaked
    to the press. The CIA and other’s would have made sure that President Obama’s
    leadership was called into question with a simply rumor to the right sources.
    This would have immediately called up a similar situation where ex-President
    Clinton decided to not “arrest” bin Laden when the CIA had him because he was
    embroiled in the Lewinski scandal and impeachment proceedings. Usama bin Laden
    was not such a perceived threat that Clinton couldn’t pass on him for fear of an
    international incident if we failed or international outrage because we
    sanctioned an assassination without “due process”. You may have forgotten this
    fact!

  3. Send in the Seals
    – this was the high risk choice, but
    it was high risk only to the Seals that were on the mission. If the mission
    failed, it was just another mission to try to take out high value terrorist
    targets and we make a bad political within Pakistan over
    allowing drones to attack over their soil a little more volatile. In the best
    case, the failure is silenced by the Pakistani and it never makes it into the
    media domain at all. If the mission is a success, then President Obama has duped
    the American public into thinking he is a leader that can make hard decisions.

So not tell me how President Obama’s
decision was so difficult. It was really his only option! In contrast with
Clinton, at
least we know that Obama is capable of making a good decision for his political
career.

0
Liked it
User Comments Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond