Man Made Disasters or Terrorism

Second, there are other agendas here.  Barak and Michelle Obama hate America.  They blame the average American for things that happened years before we were born.  They want us to pay for those sins, real, imagined, and contrived.  Michelle said she was never proud to be an American till her husband was crowned as the first American Messiah.   He refuses to wear a pin showing the flag.  You can give me all the rhetoric but let’s get down to it, the only reason is simple.  He hates his country, if in fact he considers it his country.  I am not sure what he blames it for but he needs a shrink to get rid of his guilt.

One of those agendas is simple if you look at the statements by Janet Napolitano who has eschewed the word terrorism for “man-caused disasters,” explaining, “We want to move away from the politics of fear.”  

No, No, No.  One thousand times no!  The reason for the name change is like the name change from global warming (which isn’t happening) to climate change.  Global warming no longer fits the radical left’s agenda.  And man caused disasters can be useful to the radical left. 

Allow me to explain this.  Man caused disasters are anything that goes wrong that can be considered as caused by man.  Once the laws get rewritten to use the term rather than terrorism we will see an ugly face put on this.  Look at some of the things that could now be tried under what was once the terrorism statues.

A bridge collapses – the people involved in the construction and maintenance can be tried under the for “man-caused disasters” statues.  Mistakes and bad judgment can not be treated the same as willful terroristic acts!  

An engineer or construction crew who makes a mistake can be tried like the men who planned 911!

This may sound perverse but check it out.  This is one more of the “Hate America” initiatives of the Obama Gang.