<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspapers: Broadsheet Vs. Tabloid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socyberty.com/issues/newspapers-broadsheet-vs-tabloid-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socyberty.com/issues/newspapers-broadsheet-vs-tabloid-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:13:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mariella</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/issues/newspapers-broadsheet-vs-tabloid-2/comment-page-1/#comment-140703</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/issues/newspapers-broadsheet-vs-tabloid-2/#comment-140703</guid>
		<description>That was amazing! Thanks for helping me with my h/w. I would have never finished it without you. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was amazing! Thanks for helping me with my h/w. I would have never finished it without you. <img src='http://socyberty.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/issues/newspapers-broadsheet-vs-tabloid-2/comment-page-1/#comment-140697</link>
		<dc:creator>James Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/issues/newspapers-broadsheet-vs-tabloid-2/#comment-140697</guid>
		<description>No they don&#039;t. they are actually quite similar in language and lexical approaches. You have to take a pragmatic method and try looking at the language at a purely textual level, you will have different results I guarantee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No they don&#8217;t. they are actually quite similar in language and lexical approaches. You have to take a pragmatic method and try looking at the language at a purely textual level, you will have different results I guarantee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>