Obama is a Liar

And it kept on defending it when it was postulated for the nomination of the Democratic Party during the electoral cycle 2008, and despite the deep discomfort that it was causing in the most liberal bases of the party.

In fact, many people speak about a “contradiction”, since Obama has chosen a team who stands out for his emphasis in balancing the debt (Summers was the architect of the fiscal surplus that Clinton left), when Obama will turn out to be forced to spend to full hands, if he wants to reactivate the economy and extract to the country of the recession.

The elect president treated this week as council both corners on having announced that although it favors a monstrous bundle of expense that will do emphasis on infrastructure and renewable energy – to create more than 2,5 million work places in his first two years – it will extract part of the silver of a meticulous review of the budget, eliminating all that that is not vital.

The experts believe that it is impossible to make two things – to spend simultaneously and reduce the deficit – and see an Obama dedicating the first two years to the first thing, and narrowing the belt from there from now on.

In any case, at least in commerce, it is a question of a team much moved away from the candidate who painted the commercial agreements as the Wolf of the story and who promised to raise barriers to prevent the employment from keeping on migrating to other countries. And this is a good for the aspirations of the Colombian government if, as it is waited, the TLC remains hanging for the next year.

According to David Axelrod, one of the principal advisers of the President, has not to turn in the nominations that it has made Obama a change of direction or the nonperformance of his promises. “Simply, he wants to the best available personnel like interpreter of his ideas”.

It can be. But it is undeniable that when the president asks for advices – and it will do it – it will receive from the input that he has just bought