Organizational Disaster: A Plan Assessment

Regrettably, a business or organization with a poor plan of action, which is designed to outline potential catastrophic predicaments, will likely be more disastrous in its follow through or execution, rather than proactive. In this disastrous stage of development, this indirect action plan which has been set into motion to desensitize the disaster; of which has most likely never been tested prior to its implantation, will in all probability leave that business or it organization virtually limitless; if not defenseless, during an actual emergency situation.

When comparing the emergency action plans that were utilized during the September 11, 2001 towering inferno attacks, to that of the domestic terrorism of school shootings; in many of those cases, it seems that when a profound crisis emergency occurs, it takes the organization/s by bombshell. One of the worst cases of circumstances is usually determined later to be a blaming game, when in reality; the responsible party is who ever outlined the irresponsible plan of action in the first place. It is relatively evident that certain crisis disasters could have been prevented if there were more attentive actions plans outlined; however, what is not evident is how early warning systems can be predicted and then put into effective practical use, when obviously there is too much opportunity for error.

The unsurpassed management action plans and also reliable disaster tools, are only promising when managers recognize and consider the potential and calculated faults during disasters; and therefore, they can identify them under manageable difficult resources, rather than permit them to burst into flames.

In wake of the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 initial attacks on the twin towers, the outline for emergency responders was obviously ineffective. For starters, the Command Center for crisis negotiations’ was located in one of the towers. While predictions are just as the word sounds, an outlined plan of action based on calculations is designed to have a response team on call for similar disasters; however, while there are fueled arguments on both sides of the pendulum; whether it was known or not that there might be an imminent attack on American soil, the likely hood of an exact location of attack is without merit.
Consequently, the location of the command center was in a location that was designed by some genius(s) somewhere who decided that one of the towers was an idealistic place at the time; however, since that crisis, new action plans have been implemented to predict and prepare for another emergency situation. When the attacks occurred, and the command center was obviously destroyed, the secondary command center which consisted of a few Red Cross triage tents, and emergency vehicles; and naturally, that was a bad idea as well.