Smothered by The Flag

Wow, this just goes to show how much leftists hate this great nation America. People feel pride about their countries. That’s true for America as well. The problem is that you leftists hate America.
You claim that we use the most resources and make everyone else poor. That is a slanderous leftist claim. You portray Americans s uneducated people who just eat fast food. You leftists must be happy that Obama was elected, since he is a Socialist radical who is the antithesis of America’s greatness.

Vincent, first off, I don’t think criticizing America makes you hate it. No country is perfect. Even before Obama was President, I was critical of some policies of American Administrations. For example, I think it was a mistake of George W. Bush to cuddle up with the Holocaust-denying Palestinian terrorist leader Mahmoud Abbas [though Obama is taking it to another level] and I am critical of America not standing up to Saudi Arabia because we are too dependent on oil. However, if you look at the overall picture, America has brought freedom and democracy to the world. America has liberated Europe from the Nazis, then liberated eastern Europe from Communist tyranny and is now fighting a war on radical Islamic terrorism. This article doesn’t simply just criticize American policy [some of which should be criticized]. This article attacks Americans who take pride in their nation. That is anti-American. This anti-American article also makes slanderous accusations against America and verbally attacks the American people, as well as verbally attacking the American flag. America does not use most of the world\’s resources. That is a leftist anti-American claim. Also, Obama’s “great ideas” is to have more government control, more government waste and will even dramatically increase the deficit [instead of cutting it in half, as Obama promised to do]. Obama’s “great ideas” is also to apologize to America and to appease America’s totalitarian enemies at the expense of its allies and the pro-democracy freedom fighters. Honduras is a case example. When it comes to Israel, he is unpopular there because of his bullying obsession over the settlements and any construction in them. I love how at least many leftists dress their anti-Americanism as legitimate criticism of America and then say that those who oppose Obama are un-American [something they wine about when they\'re called that]. Under Bush, we were told that dissident was patriotic over and over. Now, at least many leftists act like dissident means that you’re racist, un-American, like the Nazis and/or like the KKK. The American people are waking up to Obama’s “great ideas” i.e. his radical agenda. Remember Obama attempted to hire the radical black Supremacist Communist Van Jones [who thinks that white environmentalists and polluters conspire to pollute the neighborhoods of colored people]. Yet he was exposed. And now we have Anita Dunn as the WH Communications Director who has the Communist butcher Mao as one of her favorite philosophers. Face the facts instead of believing that leftist propaganda.

I find it interesting that you don’t disagree with me about the overall picture. Of course, you acknowledge that Obama is imperfect. When it comes to the surge in Afghanistan, that is where I support Obama. Though at the same time, I think he should’ve brought more troops [that is at least as much troops as McCristol recommends]. On Iran, I prefer to support the pro-democracy movement. If America or Israel does bomb Iran’s nuclear weapons program, then I’d be supporting it. You mention the Natives and Mexicans, as well as the fact that we had slaves. Yes, there were injustices committed against Native Americans. And slavery did not end with the founding of America. At the same time, while founding fathers did own slaves, they also used their influence to fight against the idea of slavery. George Washington used his influence to fight against slavery and even got his slaves freed after his death. The fact is that America wasn’t built upon slavery. There already was slavery. Why would the founding fathers fight against a major world empire just to keep something already there? It doesn’t make any sense. The Founding Fathers talked about freedom and democracy, not about slavery, which wasn’t a uniquely American thing. It was the norm in those days. Ancient Egyptians, Persians, Greeks, Romans and Muslims had slaves. Also, with the Mexicans, Mexico also wanted the war as well as James K. Polk. Both America and Mexico wanted more territory. For contrary to the anti-American leftist revisionist history, Mexico was not simply a victim of the big bad US. In fact, the world actually assumed that Mexico would win and underestimated the US army. Santa Anna de Lopez threatened to capture Washington DC. So Mexico was also determined to fight and wanted more territory. Had Mexico won the war, it would’ve been the US, not Mexico, to have lost territory if it continued to exist. By the way, America has given up lots of territory and allowed many peoples to be independent without a fight. This move is contrary to what an imperialist empire would do.
I’m for less government involvement when it comes to the economy. By the way, though I’m a Conservative, I’m for same sex marriage and have an article saying that we should have it. As for being pro-choice or pro-life, I will not say my position here.

I changed my views on same-sex marriage. Though I don’t personally agree with Homosexuality, I believe that Homosexuals have the right to live by their lifestyle. Though marriage is between a man and a woman.