The Democratic Development in Egypt

  The democratic development in Egypt is still in the beginning and reflects our potentials in development and growth . Yet we think the rate of participation  is weak ; 30 % attendance does not achieve the proportionate representation. The day of elections in Egypt is a tough tiring process . the records of the polls are not correct . the demonstrations the trouble makers make before the polls committees result in great burdens on the shoulders of the security systems . Every citizen should have a serial number rather than the poll tickets . Some experts think that the fault of democracy is that there is no guarantee to win in advance for any candidate or a party in disinterested elections . therefore some new thinkers blame democracy of that sort , , it gives a chance for some unwanted political powers to get into the political domain . this was the tune which prevailed the Shora elections . It is said that we managed to pass over the dangerous deficiency of democracy on the Egyptian way and we walked on the same routes of the Algerian , Syrian and Yemen elections . We found ourselves before  a unique one .  the sweeping majority of the party wins actually ; those who were possessing authority will take the same seats they were already having , without any real change . the real problem of this situation is not the case of frustration and depression the people who elect have , – they originally don’t go to the polls -  they lost the confidence of democratic change , but the continuation of this deformed position , how democracy – in our Arab world changes into a dirty stupid game ? it allows elections really , but it is the sort of elections that lead to – consecrating the authority in the same ruling class . It will make this game hasardous ; where they can eliminate the unwanted candidates and put in custody those who would probably win . It is said that the security system put in custody more than one thousand candidates from the ” Muslim Brothers ” and the independents ; allegating that they belong to the banned group or they utilise religious slogans . This added an atmosphere of horror and lack of security .What marked this battle is that ; it was a test to what extent the policy the state used to prevent the religious slogans in the political work succeeded ? Some terms of the constitution were amended aiming at the sweeping overwhelming of the Muslim Brothers had in the parliament . Nobody can claim that converting the election into a war against slogans managed to determine the political conflict between the brothers and the National Party . this democratic process is sympathetic and will lead to the death of the political work .