What are We All Thinking?

Image via Wikipedia

Its amazing what many are thinking; whether it is about the war in Afghanistan, Corrupt Banks, Sports events, or anything that comes up on in the newspapers or on TV. We all give our comments yet it is ironic and plain ignorant that our Governments, especially in the UK ignore the majority feelings.

Today I look inside the Daily Express where they have the phone polls. Yesterday’s question was should all terrorist face the death penalty? The obvious result was 99% said Yes! 1% said No! That was obviously the terrorist himself or a few who support him.

The trouble is the league of human rights who feel they have the right to kill. However with the death sentence being reinstalled the media coverage would only make these terrorist accomplish the publicity to their cause, thus raising sympathy and more support. But there are ways of carrying this out is by omitting Media coverage and disclosure of names and causes.

In Today’s Daily Express the Question is; Was the Judge right to criticise the immigration chaos?

Judge Ian Trigger was handling the case of Jamaican Drug dealer Lucien Mclearley, who remained in the UK to sell drugs and said hundreds and thousands of immigrants were flooding here placing a great burden on the Tax-payer.

The Government are now investigating into his statements because his comments were too political. This also adds to the question on this Government’s capability of running this once Great Britain.

My answer is to the question is “Yes!”

He was echoing how many of people feel when they have to work, then some criminal comes over and lives off the state. I am not racist and feel that as long as someone has a carrier or profession and is willing to work, and contribute to the state is fine by me, but there are still many issues like working for no less than the minimum wage.

Accommodation to maximum of two per bedroom and pay poll taxes. Work gangs to be vetted and lose licence to trade or even deportation if abusing system.

There are certain MPs and Lords who may disagree and want to live in the early parts of the last century and beyond and are pushing us that way, but would not consider themselves working for less that £60,000 a year.