Would You Become a Vegetarian to Save The World?
Most think of cap and trade and hybrid cars when someone says: “What can we do to combat global warming?” But, I bet there is one agenda being pushed by global warming gurus that most do not have on their “to do” green list- go vegetarian.
Lord Stern of Brentford, one of the leading experts on global warming, has everyone in the meat market gritting their teeth. Lord Stern suggests that to solve global warming, people will need to adopt a vegetarian diet. He is not alone in this sentiment. Other global warming guru’s like, Rajendra Pachauri, echo the need for a vegetarian diet. Using vegetables to combat global warming dates back to a 2006 United Nations report where it was concluded that livestock contribute 18% of worldwide greenhouse gas emissions.
The vegetarian theory is universally based on three main points: direct emissions of methane from cows and pigs -via manure and flatulence, the amount of water it takes to raise livestock and irrigate land, and deforestation of land to raise livestock.
So, as of late, global warming studies have put gas guzzlers on the back burner to prove the point of a meat free diet. For example, a University of Chicago study recently estimated that switching to a vegan diet would have a bigger impact than trading in your SUV for a hybrid. However, I do find it ironic that many of the global warming “experts” pushing a vegetarian diet, like the two researchers for the University of Chicago and Rajendra Pachauri, were vegetarians before this even become an issue. So, I have to wonder if their agenda is not 100% related to global warming.
My Opinion:
I will be the first to admit that Americans eat too much meat. A study by the American Institute for Cancer estimated that only 27% of Americans eat the correct proportion of animal to plant food. In nursing school, I was taught that a meat portion should be no larger than the palm of your hand. I don’t know how scientific that is, but it is a good guide for a moderate diet. I think that too often the focus of a problem, whether it be global warming or combating obesity, is to ban or elimintate… instead of introducing moderation and making problem items more efficient. Prohibition should be example one that banning doesn’t work.
Unless these scientists and researchers are proposing to create an extinction issue by sterilizing livestock, there will always be animals that are farting, defecating, drinking water, and deteriorating the land. Those animals will naturally procreate whether livestock farming exist or not. One does not have to become a vegetarian to introduce animal protein moderation into their diet and aid the global warming cause.
Liked it













User Comments
Teves
On November 4, 2009 at 5:32 am
Good stuff…
Petalm
On November 4, 2009 at 7:10 am
Well written.
CHAN LEE PENG
On November 4, 2009 at 10:30 am
Eating more meat is not only bad for your health, but also not good for our environment. The large scale domestic livestock has undeniably polluted the environment faster than a patch of vegetation.
B Nelson
On November 4, 2009 at 12:03 pm
I am not a Vegetarian but have cut down my meat intake, most people eat 60% more meat a week than they actually need – a proper serving size is about the size of a deck of cards. and meat is not needed at every meal, or every day.
I encourage people to eat FREE RANGE EGGS as a protein source (keeping your own hens is great!!)
But the BEST thing I did for the environment, is stopped having kids after one! As much as we blame livestock – it is the numbers of people on the planet who are the biggest problems. Reduce the amount of meat you eat.. and reduce the amount of kids you plan to have.
Phill Senters
On November 4, 2009 at 4:00 pm
If we et rid of all the animals, then the scientists will probably say we’re all gonna freeze because of “Global Cooling” like they did in in the 70s. It’s gonna be bad no matter what we do. Are we gonna kill all the cats and dogs when they blame some global crisis on them?
Uma Shankari
On November 5, 2009 at 10:44 pm
Hmmmm…I have a lot more to say on this. May be some other time. Basically, I agree with Nelson.
A good topic to debate on (Tho’ I haven’t contributed to it at all) and well expressed opinions, as usual.
Post Comment