Canonically Rejected Articles
by In the canonical community one would have to accept when they say two times two equals seven otherwise giving the right answer make him/her not canonical. Some times questioning common wisdom in the search of absolute right will make us not canonical. As there is risk to change perceptions of community, potentially he/she would be rejected or even destroyed by community’s so called canonical authorities.
Introduction
In fact, the word “canon” means accepted law. It is an oriental word (Canon) but used in occident to stop all kind of mind confusing novelty, reforms and renaissance in order to keep people from directing their attention to what they thought to be fruitful for their community. Rather canon, many times, turned out to create an enforcing social system for the fruitfulness of the community’s governors.
In 870, in Baghdad, Anan Ben David said to the Jewish rabbis: look at these Muslims, they have not any rabbi and they believe God freely. They read and decide themselves according their holy Quran. You want us to believe the Talmud which you write with your hands. Let us be free to reach to our holy Book. We are able to understand our holy Book; we do not need your help, your falsifications. We are “karaim=reader and commenter”. That was not a canonic action for the Hebrew community of Baghdad and the karaims were refused, expulsed from the Jewish community.
In 325, Christians were divided in two parties. One party said Jesus is a man like everybody; the other said Jesus is the son of God. The council of Nicaea accepted that “anyone who refuses to say Jesus is not the son of God will be expulsed from Christian community”. This way, many holy Bible were declared not canonic.
Galileo said “the Earth is turning around the Sun.” It was considered as a big insult against Christianity. Earth should have been the center of the universe. That was not canonic to affirm such new idea. He was excommunicated!
Kepler said the orbits of the planet are elliptical. The canonic community agreed such science until today, and kept mouth closed till today, never said the contrary, otherwise he/she is not canonic. You intend to destroy people’s estimation, and so you should be destroyed for the safety of the community.
To keep a community in living mode, the governors decide what other people should believe in. So all new idea, reform, renaissance are said not canonic.
Academic patrons, barons of science, should keep people from learning realities for the sake of their interest, their respect, their honorable level!
To write the planet’s orbit is not elliptical is a non-canonic article subject. Such article should be rejected, demolished, never published. Otherwise all our academic believing is in danger.
To affirm an equation “equivalent to the elliptic integrals” is not canonic. To accept such article for publication and bring some facilities for math will create big danger in academician’s economy.
To comment Thales theorem to solve an unsolved problem is not canonic. The problem should be treated by rabbis of math, this is not your duty and their false solution should be considered correct. Otherwise you are “persona non grata”.
To facilitate the solution of any problem is not canonic. It should stay complicated and you must need the help of rabbis of science. You should respect their power, their canon.
Conclusion
Do not do like Anan Ben David, say 2 times 2 equal 7, otherwise you will be excommunicated. Do not be an anarchist. Say “long live our occidental democracy?!”
Pretend to believe in God and hide your desire to believe in to your own fetish.
Do not think, just obey the canons; false or true doesn’t matter, just obey. Be muttons.
Otherwise your attitude creates “casus belli”.
Liked it
