Living in a Lawsuit Happy Society
Discussing a recent lawsuit that was pointless and a waste of the court and attorney’s time.
When does bending the rules to please the norm going too far? This is stemming from Lisa Carlson, a single lesbian female from California who is suing
E-Harmony
for discrimination because they don’t provide their service to gays, lesbians, bisexual, or trans gendered. This doesn’t make a bit of sense when there are enough dating websites out there to cater to people who choose to engage in the alternative lifestyle, but this was after the attorneys for both E-Harmony and Carlson were on TV giving statements on their clients’ behalves claiming that it’s discrimination to there’s no real ground for discrimination.
I would have to agree with the attorney for E-Harmony who also cited a similar suit was filed in California as well until the judge over the case dismissed it calling it “frivolous”. It’s getting to the point that people who choose to live and engage in the alternative lifestyle looking for relationships that they’re looking for people to bend the rules for that, but there are websites out there that service different lifestyles. It goes beyond a gay/straight issue it’s in other areas too because it seems as if people are using this as a reason to suit their need instead of the needs of others.
How is it fair that people are permitted to sue dating services that caters to a certain lifestyle, if they don’t service your particular lifestyle(s) then move on and there are too many things you can look up to suit your lifestyle taste and suing a single dating company for rules that are not discriminatory they prefer to serve customers who are heterosexual having a preference and discrimination are two different areas. We live in a sue-happy society where we’re suing for the most pointless things especially a Virginia judge who sued a local cleaners for $60 million dollars over a pair of missing pants. Not only was the judge abusing his legal power, but he is also making it look bad for the officers of the court and the law who take their positions seriously.
Sometime back in the late 80’s someone had gone to McDonald’s for breakfast and had ordered a cup of coffee and ended up spilling it in their lap and got a 2nd degree burn injury and they sued McDonald’s for a million dollars when it wasn’t even necessary to sue for that much when they could have sued for medical expenses and reasonable lost wages, but a million dollars was a bit excessive. Other fast food places that served coffee across the board had printed on their cups “Warning: Contents in cup are hot” after the lawsuit against McDonald’s was made public so that other establishments could avoid getting sued as well for a spill.
It’s gotten to the point that people find reasons to sue for some of the dumbest things that aren’t even worth the monetary amounts they’re seeking. I think this woman who sued E-Harmony wasn’t obviously too smart when she knew that their stipulations were as such that their services is not open to gays and lesbians. The suit was pointless and pathetic because she could have gone on sites like
PlanetOut.com
,
Gay.com
, and local personal ads in the paper, but to sue a website that she should have been well aware didn’t service alternative lifestyles.
To sue E-Harmony she wasted the time of the court and the attorneys representing both sides because the lawyers have more important cases to handle than some disgruntled gay woman who wanted a dating service to change their policies so she could use the service too. This is where people need to differentiate the fact that gays and lesbians have more than enough resources online for them to look for people to date and websites appropriate to the lifestyle. The lawsuits today are just pointless and a waste of the lawyers and the court’s time.
Liked it

