You are here: Home » Lifestyle Choices » The Ethics of Vegetarianism

The Ethics of Vegetarianism

Defines vegetarianism on a variety of wavelengths, but elaborates and focuses on reasons why vegetarianism is ethical.

I choose to be a vegetarian because I want to. I am rather “silent” on the issue and I don’t force my lifestyle upon anyone else. In fact, since I am a lacto-ovo, it would make no sense to force my lifestyle upon someone else. It is purely a subjective truth, as I can’t say that it is universally right to be a vegetarian and that there are many individuals in this world, who would disagree, however; I can state my reasons for being one.

I believe that it is clearly unethical to create life for the sole purpose of killing it. Over two billion animals are killed on a daily basis annually. Even if the entire planet would become vegetarian, it would not accumulate the amount of animals being slaughtered. Sacrificing the complexity to save another life form to increase my own would be selfish to me. If you were a chicken, a calf, a pig, or any other animal, would you want to be raised to be eaten later on? Knowing there are other sources of food that exist, would you want to be chosen to be the one eaten?

The vegetarian lifestyle has become more “pro” as of late and has a lot of benefits. In fact, the positive exceeds the negative regarding the lifestyle. As most individuals who are vegetarian follow that particular lifestyle, most do it for ethical reasons, others do it for nutritional reasons, others do it because they don’t like meat, and others do it because they just want to.

I believe that our ancestors probably did get by without eating meat. Real predators have reduced digestive channels, which humans do NOT have. It can be argued on physiological and psychological wavelengths, that eating meat is not natural, as our stomachs possess inadequate pH levels. I think once someone had the opportunity to taste meat, they just couldn’t leave it alone. This has developed into a “meat eating persuasion” and therefore; created objections towards the vegetarian lifestyle.

Excess consumption of red meat is linked to a number of age-related disorders, especially atherosclerosis. Red meat’s detrimental health effects out weight the anti-glycation benefits, that are used in any con vegetarian argument. Although, individuals who choose the vegetarian lifestyle are said to be lacking “carnosine” (which is found in meat) they are said to achieve a higher life expectancy than individuals who eat meat. This expectancy varies upon individual, but can achieve a range of up to 80%. According to Dr. William Castelli, M.D. “vegetarians live three to six years longer than meat eaters”. Animal products are high in sodium, which causes the blood to retain water and also causes plaque to build up in the arteries, lowering blood flow, which are major causes of high blood pressure, one of the biggest killers in the world. Although, individuals who are “con” towards vegetarianism elaborate that individuals who choose the lifestyle will lack certain nutrients that are found in “meat” they seem to also forget that vitamins exist for that reason. Also, don’t forget that tofu and spinach, along with nuts, and other foods possess a lot of key nutrients that are found in meat, i.e. Animals who are killed for food sources, eat vegetables. Humans who choose to eat meat, are not eating pasture animals. They are eating animals that feed on crops. Most individuals who object the vegetarian, vegan, and fruitarian lifestyles seem to debate that eating crops is unhealthy; but what do they think they are eating?

13
Liked it
User Comments
  1. Becker

    On April 2, 2008 at 11:48 pm


    Most of the time when people say another’s article is poorly written and banal, they are simply saying they don’t understand it because it’s too big for them. These are the same psuedo thinkers that can’t accept true knowledge. I think this article is fantastic. Definitely one of the best I have read.

  2. brandy simmons

    On August 1, 2008 at 11:55 am


    I think this article best describes how I feel about being a vegetarian among other reasons. But it’s so hard for others to understand or maybe they just don’t want to hear another side. Either way I am happy with my choices and research and wish people in general wouldn’t be so judgemental. Thanks for putting into words what I couldn’t.

  3. Christy

    On October 15, 2008 at 10:54 am


    I agree with all of the points you made in your article but I believe that there are more important and pressing matters at hand. It is great that you are taking this more ethical (and healthier) route but I would rather have the 2 billion animals dying to provide a reasonably filling food source to those with no alternative. You made a point about how you would value a person’s life over an animals, and I agree, but mass slaughter for food should be acceptable for those who live on nothing.

  4. Jarcon

    On March 15, 2009 at 2:51 pm


    This is an incredible article, extremely well written, and sticks out the points vegetarians like me argue with other people about. I have a friend who constantly strikes up debate with me, and I always present these reasons or ones like them. I hope that this article can become more popular so more people can see it.

    Also, to Christy; You can’t say mass slaughter for food should be acceptable for people who live on nothing. First of all, its not. Second of all, people who live on nothing shouldn’t be buying meat, which is expensive, they should be buying cheaper things, such as vegetables, etc.

  5. WolfTeeth

    On February 23, 2011 at 7:56 am


    Very good, I applaud you. I’m so glad you put this up. And Christy- Jarcon has a point, I live in China and the so called ‘people who live on nothing’ hardly ever eat meat. And also, ‘mass slaughter’? What the hell? Are you the incarnate of Hitler?

Post Comment
Powered by Powered by Triond