What is NASA Not Telling Us?

In a current, high profile legal battle, NASA, stands have been accused of the following:-

• Amending and secreting photographic evidence of UFO’s, in an attempt to deliberately conceal the truth from the public.

• Secret possession of alien spacecraft

• Knowledge, covert development and use of alien technology – including “free energy” technology.

• Having “None-Terrestrial Officers” off planet?

NASA is commissioned to “Look for signs of life in other planetary systems” – which is funded by Government Grants – if it is revealed that any of the accusations are true, the allegations could affect not only the level of blind trust afforded to NASA’s findings, but also future funding.

These accusations are the result of a high profile court case against UK Hacker, Gary McKinnon.

Gary Mckinnon, who suffers from Asperger’s Syndrome (a mild form of autism), from London was an avid sci-fi fan with a particular interest in UFO’s. In the late 1990’s, he started to research all related topics of interest on the internet. He had computer qualifications and using his (fairly basic) knowledge, he found – amazingly – that he could easily hack into NASA’s and other US military systems computer systems.

Gary openly admits that he became obsessed in his search for “the truth” (a common symptom of Asperger’s Syndrome) and continued to hack into US computer systems, on a regular basis for a number of years thereafter.

NASA computers were not all password protected, and Gary confirms that whilst he was hacking, he could see that there were several other hackers, from other countries, were in their systems, he assumed that many of them were in fact, foreign Governmental hackers (hence they do not face prosecution).

Gary continued to hack, even though he was fully aware that his actions were wrong and illegal, due to the interesting and concerning nature of files that he gained access to – including; evidence of UFO cover ups and knowledge of technology “free energy” – which he believed was information that, morally, should be in the public domain.

In 2002, whilst hacking, Gary got a knock on the door – his computer activities had been under surveillance for a number of weeks – he would be charged and face a trial in the UK – under the law at that time, he would be facing a fine and 6 months community service .

In 2005, Gary was re-arrested – the American Government was demanding that he be extradited and face trial in the USA – a potential 60-70 year sentence in a high security jail if found guilty.

He stands accused of causing $800,000.00 worth of damage to NASA’s computer systems – this is an accusation that Gary denies, he claims that he merely browsed files and left a couple of cheeky notes regarding the poor level of security. The McKinnon family have launched an internet appeal for assistance from the general public in this case in the following website LINK.

After losing an appeal in the House of Lords to prevent extradition, there is a last attempt judicial review on 20th January 09, which will ultimately decide his fate – this date has now been extended.

It is ironic however, that NASA’s attempt to bury this individual, along with his knowledge, has actually lead to a high profile legal battle.

A number of credible ex-NASA employee “whistle-blowers” http://www.disclosureproject.org/ have agreed to support Gary McKinnon in this case by providing eye-witness testimony, examples of situations where UFO knowledge was deliberately secreted or altered to prevent the public finding out “the truth”.

Reports of UFO sightings have occurred throughout history, See the following link: “The UFO – Religion Connection“.

The number of reported sightings has seen a sharp increase in the last few years – should we be concerned? Why is this? – There are a few possible explanations:-

• Increased alien interest in the Earth

• Increased covert Governmental technology use – UFO’s of Earth origin

• Increased technology available to the general public – Night vision / infra red or UV digital cameras

• Increased technology available to the public to allow them to produce “fake” UFO footage.

• Decreasing negative stigma attached to those who claim to have seen a UFO