Famous People: Entitled to Privacy?
Are famous people entitled to privacy or does the public have the right to know everything about them?
Famous people are always persuaded by photographers and reporters, which destroys their privacy, and enables the public to know the daily life of every celebrity. Celebrities have benefits and disadvantages, which have to face beeing famous people.
When someone takes on the lifestyle of “the rich and famous”, he should understand and accept the good and bad things that are bundled with beeing a famous person. These type of people should know the consequences of beeing someone famous and have to be aware of the prices they have to pay beeing a celebrity. Furthermore, if normal people aren’t entitled to privacy, why should famous people be? A celebrity should’t bee treated as special individuals only because they are famous, and appear in television every day, or in magazines because of their scandals and nude pictures.
In adition, if famous people are entitled to privacy, most of the magazines and tv programs would be affected, because their work is based on these people, and if their privacy would be entitled, is would cause the break down of magazines and tv shows. Also many celebirites become famous because they are exposed in their good and rational way, as in tv shows and movies, why should’t they be exposed in their private and real way, so that the public really knows who is that person?
In conclusion I think that the public have the right to know everything about famous people, because what makes someone a celebrity or a famous person, is the common people, so without the public, famous people are nothing but single individuals.
Liked it


-
-
Post Commentadam
On June 17, 2009 at 3:23 pm
it helped mea lot on my english homework
Heeral
On November 14, 2009 at 12:30 am
needed for my writing and referencing assignment…..used quite alot of reference from here…thanks….