Matriarchal Society: Does It Exist Today?
Matriarchal societies have existed in several parts of the world in the past, and many continue to exist even today.
The extent of a society’s development is reflected in the freedom that its women enjoy. The patriarchal society existing today is at least three thousand years old and is known to have shown scant regard for women and perpetrated many atrocities on them. Women have been objectified, considered men’s property, abused physically, their cry for justice dismissed, depoliticised and deprioritised, and in many countries, even their life is sniffed out at birth. Today 74 million women and girls are ‘missing’ in South Asia. Prejudices impede women’s entry in parliaments around the world so that they hold just over 18 per cent of the seats in positions of power.
The reasons for patriarchy is often assumed to be the superior physical strength of men with which they could subdue and bring women onto their knees, and hence patriarchy is assumed to be the natural order of things. Yet, even today there are societies with matriarchal patterns in Asia, Africa, the Americas and Oceania. Several ancient cultures have revered the Divine Mother principle that represents the nurturing spirit and the natural bond between the mother and the child. This Goddess cult could very well have been the origin of all matriarchal societies.
Matriarchy doesn’t mean a mere reversal of patriarchy, where women somehow rule over men – as the usual misinterpretation goes – instead, they are egalitarian societies. They are societies that have their guidelines and codes and are still free of domination. Power, as well as wealth, is not concentrated in a single person, and most decisions are made by the consensus of all. And this is what makes them so attractive to those looking for a new philosophy to support the creation of a just society.
Generally, matriarchies are extended clans. The people live together in big clans, which are based on matrilineality; that is, children are identified in terms of their mother rather than their father and kinship as represented by the clan’s name is passed on through the mother’s line. Such a matri-clan consists at least of three generations of women: the clan-mother, her daughters, her granddaughters, and the directly related men: the brothers of the mother, and her sons and grandsons. The women live there permanently, because daughters and granddaughters never leave the clan-house of their mother when they marry. This is called matrilocality.
Ancient societies were matrilineal because there was no “one-man-one-woman” concept; humans just lived in communities and being hunters and gatherers, they were always on the move. Paternity would have been difficult to determine; hence the children took the name of their mother.
Liked it


-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post CommentSail338
On November 19, 2010 at 8:13 am
Nice Write
Anuradha Ramkumar
On November 19, 2010 at 8:16 am
Very well said, Uma. I totally agree with your views.
RAJEEV BHARGAVA
On November 19, 2010 at 8:42 am
a very well reasearched and informative article. i enjoyed reading it immensely. thanks for creating and sharing.
K Kristie
On November 19, 2010 at 9:25 am
Very insightful.
SimplyShash
On November 19, 2010 at 9:32 am
An entirely different and well presented topic. Thanks.
Guy Hogan
On November 19, 2010 at 1:04 pm
I learned something new today. Thank you.
Yovita Siswati
On November 19, 2010 at 6:22 pm
very interesting research! thanks.
giritharanj
On November 19, 2010 at 7:49 pm
nice share – gj
albert1jemi
On November 19, 2010 at 9:38 pm
WELL Written
Mr.Reggie
On November 19, 2010 at 10:02 pm
excellent write!
Val Mills
On November 20, 2010 at 5:17 pm
Thank you for this. I am extremely grateful to be living here in New Zealand.
Judy Sheldon
On November 20, 2010 at 11:35 pm
Thanks so much for this fascinating glimpse of a matriarchal society. I love learning about different cultures. Good for those women who turned their victimization around!!
Uma Shankari
On November 21, 2010 at 7:46 am
Thanks Judy for reading the second page. Most of the readers, I’m afraid, don’t go that far!
Kaye TM
On November 21, 2010 at 9:32 am
nice share
Nynke Fokma
On December 7, 2010 at 5:14 am
I am quoting your entry paragraph and have added two links in my article.
http://stonecircles.wordpress.com/2010/12/05/winners-and-losers/
Is that okay? Sadly, I am at a loss at the moment for what might work …
Nynke Fokma
On December 7, 2010 at 5:17 am
I am quoting your entry paragraph and have added two links in my article “winners and losers” on how patriarchy is undermining its own position. Is that okay?
Sadly, I am at a loss at the moment for what might work to prevent ragnarokish events.
Nynke Fokma
On December 7, 2010 at 5:21 am
Sorry, I got server errors on my comment trying to save it. I thought it might be the link. So I made another comment. Now there’s two. And apparently I cannot remove my second comment. Can you remove it for me? Thank you.
Brigid Holmes
On May 15, 2011 at 3:06 pm
You say that matriachal societies don’t work on domination of men, and yet that is contradicted by these examples which show that the women do have authority over the men, and men are regarded more as assistants, whilst the rules of the society are geared more to female instincts. These societies show that when male authority is challenged it must be replaced by female authority. The reason male authority has caused such terrible abuses to women is because of the fallen nature of humankind, but God designed male and female to have general biological and spiritual differing roles, and humans will only be happy when they accept this. He designated males to act more as authority figures and this is not sexist as males can never take on the awesome task of pregnancy, and are not generally as well equpped to care for their young and clean etc. This doesn’t mean women shouldn’t be free to take positions of authority and women MPs are essential, but because humanity is rejecting the authority of God’s laws women try to rule men as it says in Genesis chapter 1. Feminism is not really about allowing women to be free women, it’s about encouraging women to be what they are not, and where women try to take on too many masculine roles, there will only be a lack in the feminine ones. Which you can see today in this feministic world where kids are suffering more than before from less time with their mums, being put in childcare too much, women suffering more from stress related depression as they try to take on men’s roles and a woman’s and find they are NOT superhuman after all! And men are suffering too as they do not have the support of women as much, as too many women want to be self sufficient, part of the reason for the high male suicide rate. A woman should never accept the abusive authority of a man, and it’s tragic where these abuses happen, and the bible says a man should respect his wife and listen to her advice. But now it’s going to the opposite extreme where women are trying to prove they are greater and stronger than the man, but this leads to an unhealthy society and not the utopia people think.
Angie
On June 29, 2011 at 2:51 am
I have seen matriarchal societies, and although your research is nice, it is not conclusive nor is it finished. In most matriarchal societies, there is a diminished value in men. The apparent equality is not a reality. In these societies, the matriarch sees the men more as pawns to to placed where they can do the most harm to the enemy helping the matriarch keep or gain more power. These societies have just as many problems as the patriarchal ones. Equality is based on individuals being able to value one another, and a set of rules forced upon others is already devaluing one person or the other. If we truly valued one another, we would stop worrying about who is in charge and listen more than we talk. That is the basis of equality, and putting one gender above another destroys it.