Are You a Transcendentalist or an Existentialist?
Find out how you think.
Transcendentalism and Existentialism are just big fancy words that describe a way of thinking. What I found in my research was that you can be a little bit of both. Don’t be alarmed! Test the way you think!
A Transcendentalist
Definition:
Pure reason transcends physical or empirical truth.Just so every one knows, Empirical means relying on experience or observations.
Symptoms of the Average Transcendentalist
You can believe in something you can’t see.
An example would be the following: God, spirits or ghosts, and aliens. You have the ability to believe. To you even if you cannot see what it is; it doesn’t mean that it isn’t there.
You tend to look for order in your universe.
- When something happens like your friend doesn’t show up to dinner. You try to make excuses in you head on why they wouldn’t. Such as, “They probably got stuck by a train.” or, “They probably don’t know what time it is.” If they don’t show up you come with the idea that they had some sort of emergency and that is why they haven’t called. You do this to make yourself feel better about the situation, and to make yourself feel better.
For you, everything happens for a reason, life already has a path.
-For example, karma. What comes around goes around. To you, your life has been planned and you know it, and believe that it does. You also try to make decisions based on what you think your plan for life is. Such as what your major is in college, and what type of job you do after college.
An Existentialist
Definition:
Create your own being or existence.
Symptoms of the Average Existentialist
You can’t believe in something that you cannot see.
-You don’t believe in God, because you have never seen him, ghosts, or aliens unless you have seen them before.
Life has no Plan
You believe that you make your own life. Your path has not been written because you are still carving it. You make your own decisions based on what you want, because no one controls your future; you make your own mistakes.
You tend to make decisions based on what has meaning to you instead of what is rational.
You mainly use this to lessen your own personal anxiety. Toss all rationality to the wind when something that means something to you happens.
No matter if you’re a Transcendentalist or an Existentialist you shouldn’t change the way you think about things. That’s what makes you unique!
Liked it













User Comments
Marlene Kelly
On December 3, 2007 at 12:19 pm
This is a very clear definition of both words!I’m definitely a Transcendentalist!!
IcyCucky
On December 17, 2007 at 12:27 pm
I think I’m a little bit of both.
Wonderful article, Alexa.
Jared Stenzel
On December 30, 2007 at 7:59 pm
Man such big words, I believe I am more of an existentialist.
alexmusic
On January 2, 2008 at 12:00 pm
i like it! love the complete description of the words. i am a dark transcendentalist, like hawthorne or melville.
Josh
On August 25, 2008 at 1:05 pm
The definition of existentialism is flawed.
“You don’t believe in God” – does not make sense, as the first existentialist writer is often credited as being Søren Kierkegaard, a Danish philosopher who was an ordained minister and believed in an emotional relationship with God/Jesus/whatever.
bballhawk
On December 16, 2008 at 5:08 pm
Similar comment as Josh. One of the most influentatial “existentialists” is Kierkegaard. He believed in God (as an everyday subjective leap of faith).
Alex
On April 10, 2009 at 2:13 pm
I am deeply a part of both aspects. Empirical understanding allows the acceptance and the ability to freely explore the possibility of unseen entities such as God; but in no means should this alter your human ability to be skeptical of them. You should shape your own destiny and be controlled by nothing but nature and time, and yet be fully able to make sense rationally out of this idiosyncratic world which so frequently deviates from natural order. When situatons of profound meaning arise, rationality should be relinquished and the the order of natural instinct bent in order to achieve the goal. Therefore, i believe that each aspect of thinking negates the other yet both combined are extrememly powerful when one attempts to understand the world around them.
Post Comment