<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You a Transcendentalist or an Existentialist?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:34:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/comment-page-1/#comment-213151</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/#comment-213151</guid>
		<description>First of all I think that Existentialism is more about not being placed under restriction of human courtesy than being anti-everything the way you make them sound. Most of them are actually just baffled with the idea of god and have come to agnostic conclusions. Really they just live for the moment. 

Personally I believe I am both because I believe in what I can not see if I deeply believe I can feel it. But also I am much to cynical to assume the best in every situation. I go into things with the idea that I&#039;m going into them and not with any anticipation of how they will turn out. I don&#039;t come by this naturally I just have trained myself to do this out of too much dissapointment in life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all I think that Existentialism is more about not being placed under restriction of human courtesy than being anti-everything the way you make them sound. Most of them are actually just baffled with the idea of god and have come to agnostic conclusions. Really they just live for the moment. </p>
<p>Personally I believe I am both because I believe in what I can not see if I deeply believe I can feel it. But also I am much to cynical to assume the best in every situation. I go into things with the idea that I&#8217;m going into them and not with any anticipation of how they will turn out. I don&#8217;t come by this naturally I just have trained myself to do this out of too much dissapointment in life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/comment-page-1/#comment-42659</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/#comment-42659</guid>
		<description>I am deeply a part of both aspects. Empirical understanding allows the acceptance and the ability to freely explore the possibility of unseen entities such as God; but in no means should this alter your human ability to be skeptical of them. You should shape your own destiny and be controlled by nothing but nature and time, and yet be fully able to make sense rationally out of this idiosyncratic world which so frequently deviates from natural order. When situatons of profound meaning arise, rationality should be relinquished and the the order of natural instinct bent in order to achieve the goal. Therefore, i believe that each aspect of thinking negates the other yet both combined are extrememly powerful when one attempts to understand the world around them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am deeply a part of both aspects. Empirical understanding allows the acceptance and the ability to freely explore the possibility of unseen entities such as God; but in no means should this alter your human ability to be skeptical of them. You should shape your own destiny and be controlled by nothing but nature and time, and yet be fully able to make sense rationally out of this idiosyncratic world which so frequently deviates from natural order. When situatons of profound meaning arise, rationality should be relinquished and the the order of natural instinct bent in order to achieve the goal. Therefore, i believe that each aspect of thinking negates the other yet both combined are extrememly powerful when one attempts to understand the world around them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bballhawk</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/comment-page-1/#comment-42657</link>
		<dc:creator>bballhawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/#comment-42657</guid>
		<description>Similar comment as Josh. One of the most influentatial &quot;existentialists&quot; is Kierkegaard. He believed in God (as an everyday subjective leap of faith).  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similar comment as Josh. One of the most influentatial &#8220;existentialists&#8221; is Kierkegaard. He believed in God (as an everyday subjective leap of faith).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/comment-page-1/#comment-42653</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/#comment-42653</guid>
		<description>The definition of existentialism is flawed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;You don’t believe in God&quot; - does not make sense, as the first existentialist writer is often credited as being Søren Kierkegaard, a Danish philosopher who was an ordained minister and believed in an emotional relationship with God/Jesus/whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The definition of existentialism is flawed.</p>
<p>&#8220;You don’t believe in God&#8221; &#8211; does not make sense, as the first existentialist writer is often credited as being Søren Kierkegaard, a Danish philosopher who was an ordained minister and believed in an emotional relationship with God/Jesus/whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexmusic</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/comment-page-1/#comment-42655</link>
		<dc:creator>alexmusic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/#comment-42655</guid>
		<description>i like it! love the complete description of the words. i am a dark transcendentalist, like hawthorne or melville.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like it! love the complete description of the words. i am a dark transcendentalist, like hawthorne or melville.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Stenzel</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/comment-page-1/#comment-42649</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Stenzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/#comment-42649</guid>
		<description>Man such big words, I believe I am more of an existentialist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man such big words, I believe I am more of an existentialist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IcyCucky</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/comment-page-1/#comment-42647</link>
		<dc:creator>IcyCucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/#comment-42647</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;m a little bit of both.&lt;br /&gt;
Wonderful article, Alexa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m a little bit of both.<br />
Wonderful article, Alexa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marlene Kelly</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/comment-page-1/#comment-42651</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlene Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/philosophy/are-you-a-transcendentalist-or-an-existentialist/#comment-42651</guid>
		<description> This is a very clear definition of both words!I&#039;m definitely a Transcendentalist!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very clear definition of both words!I&#8217;m definitely a Transcendentalist!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

