Can Killing People be Justified
A philosophical debate by Warwick Evander.
‘If I should ever seek death – there are several times when my progressive condition challenges me – I want to guarantee that you are there supporting my continued life and its value. The last thing I want is for you to give up on me, especially when I need you most’
To conclude my section on euthanasia, I think that if somebody really wants to die, then I don’t really think that we have any right to stop them, but if they haven’t said that they want to die, then it isn’t up to us to decide that for them. However, I would also say that it would be impossible to give a definitive “yes” or “no” answer to euthanasia, as there are many different types of it and positive and negative arguments for both. Euthanasia will always remain a hotly debated issue, and it seems unlikely that it will ever be definitively resolved on a global scale.
________________________________________________________________________
Part 2-Capital punishment
Capital punishment is a hotly debated topic in many countries. Lots of people believe that it is right and proper to order the execution of someone who has committed a heinous crime. But are we really justified in giving out these sentences? Can we really say that we are doing the right thing? Lots of people would say that we are not, in direct opposition to the other “lot of people” I looked at earlier.
Firstly, I won’t deny that there are a lot of reasons for capital punishment. To begin with, many people would
____________________________________________________________________
Part 3-Religion
Religions throughout history often seem to have quite similar ideas about killing people. Most of the current major religions have a firm belief in not killing people. For example in Christianity, there is the ‘thou shalt not kill’ commandment. Other religions, such as Buddhism, also believe that killing people is wrong. However, for every religion based upon the principles of not killing people, there has been one bloodthirsty one. For example, the religion of the ancient Aztecs involved hundreds of deaths daily, in order to keep the sun coming up and down. The druidic practices of the pagans also involved many sacrifices, although not quite on the same level as the Aztecs.
Killing people does feature quite often in many religious themed myths and legends. In the religion of the ancient Greeks, wars were often glorified as contests between opposed gods. All sorts of mysterious deaths plagues and famines throughout history have been explained as the wrath of the gods (although this does lead to some quite fundamental convictions, but this is not the place to write about those).
Conclusion
To conclude, I think that it is really very difficult to give a general answer about killing for all religions, although there is practically nothing that can be applied to all religions. I think that all we can definitively say is that some religions approve of killing, although these have mostly long died out, and some religions disapprove of killing, and these make up the overwhelming majority of modern day religions. This is probably due to the fact that it is considered genocide to sacrifice people of other religions in today’s modern society.
Liked it


-
-
Post CommentJohn Locke
On November 30, 2009 at 7:45 pm
I would just like to point out, Christianity provides plenty of justification for killing. As you pulled “thou shalt not kill” out of the old testament, I would suggest you read the rest of the Old Testament. God repeatedly orders the Israelites to kill thousands people(even children).
Plus, the doctrine of salvation only through Jesus Christ provided a great justification for killing those who did not believe for over a thousand years.
If you believe in a hellfire and there are people who don’t believe what you believe, then you also can believe that those non-believers (or believers of a different, though maybe similar, dogma) pose a bad danger to others who do believe what you believe, particularly if those who do believe should be swayed by any of those that don’t believe as you do. Therefore, you have a justification to kill anyone who does not believe as you do, and you can claim it is not because you hate them or anything, only that you are protecting those who believe as you do from their influence. Basically, to protect those who do believe, kill those who do not.
Islam similarly would follow on both accounts. Although, I would agree that justifying killing under Buddhism would be much more difficult and justifying killing under Jainism is virtually impossible
t
On March 10, 2010 at 7:10 pm
#1 The druidic sacrifices weren’t all unwilling, and most were of the “criminal element.”
#2 John Locke, please read “Zen at War” and read the quotes of many enlightend Buddhist masters on such things as the Rape of Nanking