Females in Leading Roles

People who learn why they treat nerds in a certain manner can, if they want to, correct their behavior. If they don’t understand why, then there is no discipline. People involved in internacine war who understand this form of warfare can discipline themselves if they want to. Those out of control in internacine war without any knowledge at all don’t have the adequate means of controlling this form of warfare and disciplining themselves. This is true of almost all types of behavior. Sometimes people who understand these matters are forced to participate anyway, because they are dealing with naive others. When everybody understands, then it’s possible to have some discipline and some alternative behaviors.

For example, if a man connected to a leading role female is having problems dealing with that, and is “innocent” in those problems, then certainly an expert in role-playing can help these couples to be honorable in their roles, and perhaps if it is possible for that man to also assume a leading role along with his leading role female, so that they can be an honorable “power couple,” then that is the role of a role-playing expert or therapist who witnesses these problems publically and privately all the time. That is, if such couples want to continue as “power couples,” without the notion that the man and/or the woman has to be “lesser” to be supportive.

Often when people are aware of the motives and motivations of their behavior then they are able to discipline themselves, when they become self-conscious of those motives. Of course, some people prefer to be naive and innnocent role-players. If it is in their interest, then it’s acceptable. But if it’s detrimental to them/and or others, then certainly they must learn how to be expert role-players, and especially when their roles and role-playing involves not only their own well-being but the well-being of many others.

Politicians, business poeple, spiritual leaders, and public figures often are included in this analysis.

Private role-players like parents and teachers are also included in this analysis.

We can all study these leading role females for ourselves and how they all behave.

This does not mean that all leading role females are correct. Some females who go into leading roles, like men, are not necessarily qualified for those roles and should not assume them, any more than men should assume these roles. And certainly we all, including men, have a right to critique them. They, like men leaders, must be able to respond to these critiques. They can do so in their own feminine leadership styles but they like masculine leaders cannot shirk their responsibilities as leaders. They can make it clear that their styles are different. If they truly do not feel they are qualified for leadership, then female leaders, like masculine leaders must be available to withdraw from the leading role in favor of more qualified either masculine and/or feminine leadership. We don’t necessarily have to be any “nicer” to them because they are female leaders than we are to masculine leaders who assume certain roles. There is much that female leaders have to learn just like masculine leaders. They can of course perfect their feminine style of leadership and make it clear that they have different responsibilities and obligation, differing opinions and viewpoints, and a different style.