Metaphysics: Nominalism Vs. Realism
Socrates was ignorant but he aspired to wisdom, which he felt was a virtue and closer to goodness than ignorance. It was clear that he shared some of these qualities with his mother.
*Discuss this idea and more at theCulturePhile
Extreme Nominalism and Realism are two very different interpretations of the world. They both fall under the realm of metaphysics, which is the sector of philosophy that deals with the roots of existence and the general principles of things. Although this quote should mean the same thing to two philosophically ignorant people, to a realist and an extreme nominalist, this quote represents two very different things. Wisdom and ignorance are properties, therefore, a realist would see this quote as well written, as opposed to an extreme nominalist who would call it bad rhetoric and re-formulate the sentences. Although neither extreme nominalism nor realism are proven entities, extreme nominalism is the concept which makes more sense.
Extreme Nominalism is a facet of metaphysics that doesn’t believe in properties. What this means is that there is no description in the world that can be applied to two things. Which is to say everything in the world is particular. In extreme nominalism when a shoe is blue, the shoe is blue. The shoe and blue are not independent of each other, there is no such concept of blue – only a “blue shoe.” In extreme nominalism there are “blue things” but there is not an actual property called “blue;” blue is simply a word describing the shoe rather than a property which is instantiated by the shoe. Blue, and other properties are never independent from other objects. To an extreme nominalist, a name is simply a name and nothing more. A name doesn’t describe anything, it simply refers to languages and references humans have made throughout the years. Although realism and extreme nominalism are both interpretations of the world, they are in fact very different.
Unlike extreme nominalism, realism is based around the principle that properties do exist. To a realist, properties are represented(instantiated) by particulars. In the case of the blue shoe, there is a type of blue, and it is represented by the shoe, but blue and the shoe exist on their own as well. Realists also believe that properties are capable of multiple instantiations, and are not confined to one particular. For example, blue is not confined to describing a shoe, but also the sky, the ocean, and a pair of eyes. Even so, realists believe that every property is abstract and unique. To a realist, if there is a blue shoe, there is “blue” and it is instantiated by the shoe. There is not simply a blue shoe, but a shoe and the property of blue. Realists realize that this particular shoe can exist with or without the blue and vice versa. Realists also believe that it is the job of people to discover properties; they believe that properties exist before people discover them, and that it is the job of humans to find them.
Liked it


-
-
-
Post CommentJames Sullivan
On October 22, 2007 at 9:08 am
A wonderfully written essay; a philosophy professor of mine quoted Socrates in saying “I know I am smart because I know I know nothing.”
Crabber
On June 30, 2008 at 1:18 pm
Sullivan: whatchew talkin’bout, Willis? Are ya stoopit?
barberik: Hilarious! I love it!
pkafka: By asserting that everything is a particular, to end up with a circular problem, since particularity is a concept. What is particularity? And is not a property of something a part of something? An object cannot evince something it does not have. Therefore, a white horse and a white rock both evince something (light) which is intercepted by the senses of the observer equally. Something in them is common which produces the same effect on the sense in some aspect. “Whiteness” has been abstracted by the observer from both objects. While saying that white is a property of those two objects, it is sufficient to acknowledge that some judgment is being made that asserts a similarity in some measure between them.
pkafka
On February 24, 2009 at 2:42 am
thanks for the comments… we can discuss this further at my forum -
http://www.theCulturePhile.com
-pk