Salvation by Pop Culture
by The surprisingly positive influence of pop culture on the education of a child in America.
Most of my generation, I suppose, were most influenced by movies as children, movies and television. I had a different childhood. What movies I saw till the age of 15 were solely on television because my parents were members of a Holiness Christian sect that forbade going to the cinema. Even to see a Disney cartoon. We were taught that to cross the dark threshold of the moving picture parlor was to seal one’s damnation.
Yes, I had a very unusual upbringing… at least, back in the ‘60s and ‘70s, it was unusual.
I watched a lot of television, an amazing amount in retrospect, an amazing variety of shows – my parents didn’t seem to exert much control over my intake of cathode tube rays in the beginning. And my mother loved certain movies – Hitchcock, in particular. I remember seeing The Birds a number of times (starting around age 4) and being utterly fascinated and terrified.
I especially loved Westerns, war movies, and detective shows. More of my personal ethical inclinations owe more to John Wayne and Clint Eastwood’s work for Sergio Leone than to sermons and The Good Book. Then there was The Fugative and its healthy dark fear of authority; and Ephrim Zembalist, Jr. on The FBI, who just seemed trustworthy, and the flatfoots on Dragnet, the patrolmen of Adam 12; Mannix, Cannon, Barnaby Jones, Columbo, Banacheck, McMillan and Wife, McCloud; later, there’d be Quincy, ME.
But above all there was The Rockford Files, with the maverick law-bending, hard luck, happy-go-lucky, barely making ends meet Jim Rockford/James Garner. I think he was my supreme archetype for what a man was supposed to be like – the guy who tries to do the right thing, screws it up, gets punished for it, tries to do the right thing again, and so on until, at the end, he’s as broke as he started the day. But he did what he was supposed to do: stood for something worth standing for, regardless of the price, and outwitted the opposition, sometimes with the help of some dumb luck (and a sympathetic scriptwriter).
I learned about all the great and not-so-great movies of the ‘70s as they came out in the then black and white inky pages of MAD Magazine – I was introduced to the not-so-subtle arts of parody and satire and caricature, and to a bit of New York sarcasm and Yiddish cursing, all a providing a view of the world new to me. Later on I discovered the originator of MAD – Harvey Kurtzman – through reprints of the ‘50s issues, which were utterly amazing, especially the pieces with the artist Will Elder. It was like looking at William Hogarth prints made for 20th century sensibilities. As an aside, it was because of Elder and Kurtzman that I became interested in Hogarth, and thus in the 18th c. and its satirists, such as Voltaire, its philosophies and ideas.
Liked it
-
-
-
Post CommentRohit Sidhu
On October 6, 2008 at 3:11 pm
Great read.
But what you need to understand is that my generation (I’m 16) is not interested in reading.
Or good television, because it is rare these days with all these reality shows.
Or even good movies, I am appalled at the amount of bad movies Hollywood produces.
Richard Van Ingram
On October 6, 2008 at 4:16 pm
Rohit, Thank you for your comment. The point is well-taken — there is a chance I grew up in a weird sort of “golden age” of pop culture and high culture: We were trained to be literate and at the same moment were exposed to the world of imagery. I agree, this age has passed.
What I wonder, however, is even though your generation does not like to read, and is not trained to do so, whether your generation is not being deprived of or depriving itself of a perspective on the world one will never adequately achieve by other means.
Perhaps you’re being cheated.
It’s a thought.
Rohit
On October 6, 2008 at 4:43 pm
Well, I myself am interested in reading and learning. I was just reading a comic book called Watchmen. The “golden age” can be relived.
But your second point, if we are being cheated, is absolutely right. We need educational reform, I despise the way we are taught. In English for example we get work to do, finish it and hand it in. We are never taught HOW to read or HOW to write better. But it is the opposite for other courses, like Math, we are taught HOW to do the work, but not WHY it works. Use this formula to get this, I ask why and the teachers never seem to have an answer.