Theory I: Positivist Constructionism

I admit that the insufficient and short memoir is a shortfall of words with little or no emotional attachments. Nevertheless, the dictated body does offer a hint of constructionist events that defaults on the positivist agenda of absolutism, objectivism, and determinism. In other words, events are done out of relative voluntary for a subjective programming that are determinable based on the absolutist system of minimum to maximum structure with a norm objectivist stance of shifting and balancing political changes. The narrative body clearly emphasized the changes over time for self-actions, as well as external body of micro-evolutionary politics. However, it should be noted that in the self-realization section, negative deviance was virtually internationalized in the cyberspace.

Thus, the term, positivist constructivism, came to mind. Ultimately, self-realization is constructionist, because it is the mid-point of a learning process that started from bottom or nothingness. Gradually, I improvised myself to the level that is in unnatural mixed structure of norm and deviance admiration for most part in the post-identity section. Once self-improvise was in effect, I built myself around the “wall” and test the theory of an IT business paper. Self-realization did not go through a transitional process; instead, it trans-evolves into the different type. I call such change as positivist constructionism. It is named so mainly because the self-realization process had shown the understanding that the importance of norm in absolutism, objectivism, and determinism are of comprehensive requirements as mandatory challenges to political science. 

The definition of positivist constructionism is the mixed validity of marriage between positivist and constructionist theories. This means that the boundary line between two categories are unclear and integrated in one direction in an approval way. For example, positivist theories included anomie-strain: in initial stage, anomie strain is noted in the rebellious innovation of economical espionages as well as the repetitive practices of social learning theory. However, in the final stage, we can see the rise of control theory, in which social bond, self-control, and control balancing, as in the case of post-identity, when it attached the initial stage to the level of constructionism as a final stage. Constructionist theory, on other hand, also play an alternate initial stage, and does not interfere the initial stage of positivism. It is only social reality theory that associated with the self-identity.

It is in the constructionist category that plays the role of positivist constructionism.  The initial stage dissolves after attachment, as much as a death of male bee dies away after a mating with queen bee. However, the learned stage from the initial period stays in the mind that is ultimately permanent. It can be said that experiences do not die hard, or does not simply go away. Upon the dissolution, phenomenological theory put further the power theory in the question of legal reality mannerism. It is in this situated manner that brought up the conformity of postmodernist understanding of practices from the initial stage, or self-identity, as is common in any confirmed scientific experiment. It is thus the final stage in which constructionism absorbed the positivist stage, thereby becoming positivist constructionism.