9/11 – The Truth

You know what happened on September 11,2001, don’t you? It might be the most terrifying day of your life. What I have to say might shock you and you could be outraged. But look at the evidence. After you read this you might change your mind about this world and that fateful morning.

The Pentagon

Theorists agree that since there was so little “aircraft” wreckage at the Pentagon, minimal damage to the Pentagon’s lawn and outer walls, and no visible damage to the walls from the wings or stabilizers, it could not have been a Boring 757 but rather a cruise missile or a smaller aircraft. A larger section of the Pentagon’s wall did collapse about half an hour after the initial explosion but the impact hole was much smaller than the one seen after the wall came down. Additionally, the plane supposedly hit light poles near the Pentagon but instead there is little damage; light bulbs were not broken and it appears as though the poles were ripped out of the ground and laid aside.

Many people suggest that there is no damage to the walls of the Pentagon because they say the wings collapsed back against the fuselage and slipped in through the hole. “No plane” advocates point out that pictures show a hole of less than 10 feet wide made by the object. This object exited on the other side of the three rings of buildings within the Pentagon.

“The official story says that this hole was made by the nose of the 757 or an engine. Those questioning this version say the nose of an aircraft is fragile and between the point of impact and the little whole where the object came out are three rings of buildings in an area of he pentagon that had just undergone serious reinforcement to protect against a terrorist attack. Aerial photographs confirm this, as indeed does Defense Secretary Rumsfeld who said the plane “penetrated three of the five concentric rings of the building”. That means the plane had to smash through six outer walls. Could an aircraft not designed structurally to stay intact on impact, the gather skeptics ask, have been able to score through three reinforced rings of buildings and still be so intact that it could have caused the hole on the other side. The official version is a blaze of apparent contradictions. It says that when the plane struck the building it “pulverized”; the disappearance of the engines and other solid components can be explained by the fact they “melted”; the absence of 100 tons of metal is that the inferno was so hot at more then 2,500 degrees centigrade that everything “evaporated”; the little exit hole, around ten feet across, was caused by the nose of engine of the aircraft, which had penetrated three reinforced buildings despite all the former. I find it rather difficult to accept that all of those statements can be true!”1 says the author of Alice in Wonderland and 9/11.