Another Response to Tikun Olam
Richard Silverstein’s leftist self-hating Jewish site slanders the courageous Muslim hero Zudhi Jassar and his eye-opening Third Jihad documentary.
The facts on the ground is that the Third Jihad is not a Fascist film, but seeks to expose radical Islam, which is a Fascist ideology.
The slanderous post concludes with:
ll in all, this is a nice set of bedfellows with whom the Clarion Fund and the Museum of Tolerance are sleeping. But Rabbi Hier and Raphael Shore should remember what happens when you lie down with dogs…
I find it sad to report that just as Wilders spoke to synagogue audiences during his tour here, Detroit’s Temple Israel also screened Third Jihad. Someone should ask Rabbi Joshua Bennett what he was thinking when he invited these hatemongers into his shul.
The brutal truth of the matter is that instead of awakening the world to the danger of radical Islam, films like this actually promote Islamophobia and are conducive to an atmosphere that provokes violence against American Muslims.
So now Gert Wilders, Vlaams Blang and IFPS, all of who, allegedly endorse the Third Jihad documentary are now bedfellows with the Museum of Tolerance and the Clarion fund, in the far-left world of Richard Silverstein, despite the fact that there’s no evidence to support that claim. Silverstein finds it sad that Temple Israel screened the Third Jihad documentary and calls those who showed that film hatemongers without presenting any evidence. The film Third Jihad does not promote islamophobia nor is it “conducive to an atmosphere that provokes violence against American Muslims”. How is the narrator saying that he loves Islam and that he’s a devout Muslim promote Islamophobia and make it “conducive to an atmosphere that provokes violence against American Muslims”? I dare Richard Silverstein to explain how the film does do those things. That film just seeks to expose the Cultural Jihad, which seeks to radical Islamic tyranny from within, which is the same kind of society Al Qaeda fights for, but with different methods.
Any film that exposes the truth about radical Islam makes Richard Silverstein believe that that film is “one of the most Islamophobic films ever produced”, that it promotes Islamophobia and that it is “conducive to an atmosphere that provokes violence against American Muslims”. This should provoke any question from any serious person about how you can make a film that exposes radical Islam without Richard Silverstein saying these slanderous things about it. I didn’t see any part of the film that says, “Unlike some religious traditions, Islam comprehends evil as something inherently human.” But I did see Silverstein say that about Judaism on the about page. The film Third Jihad says that it’s not about Islam and that a minority of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims [really there are 2 billion Muslims, but let that pass] are radical. That doesn’t promote Islamophobia nor make it “conducive to an atmosphere that provokes violence against American Muslims”. Richard Silverstein is a radical leftist propagandist who seeks to slander all those who don’t stand Islam above criticism and/or show the threat of radical Islam. The post doesn’t even refute any of the claims made in that documentary, but just attacks the messengers and makes slanderous accusations against it that contain no evidence.
Liked it
