<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Communism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socyberty.com/politics/communism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socyberty.com/politics/communism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:12:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://socyberty.com/politics/communism/comment-page-1/#comment-21229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 06:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socyberty.com/politics/communism/#comment-21229</guid>
		<description>One of the major underlying fallacies from which your argument is premised seems to be central planning.  The most efficient system in which to judge value and increase it is individualism as opposed to central planning.  The reasons are many-fold.  Value is subjective, changing from person to person.  The best judge of value for each person, is each person.  The individual has a superior informational feedback loop to outsiders in determing their own values and how to increase them.  The individual also has a greater incentive to increase their own value than outsiders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Communism, socialism and the numerous other manifestations of central planning fail and cause damage mostly because they are inevitably inferior at determing value for others and increasing the value of others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They also create a moral dissonance because they violate the rights entailed by the self-edivent ownership of oneself.  By denying ownership of oneself and the products of one&#039;s time, talents and efforts; they are morally bankrupt at their foundation and built upon falsehood and immorality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I may respond to specific points such as child exploitation, money and education later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the major underlying fallacies from which your argument is premised seems to be central planning.  The most efficient system in which to judge value and increase it is individualism as opposed to central planning.  The reasons are many-fold.  Value is subjective, changing from person to person.  The best judge of value for each person, is each person.  The individual has a superior informational feedback loop to outsiders in determing their own values and how to increase them.  The individual also has a greater incentive to increase their own value than outsiders.</p>
<p>Communism, socialism and the numerous other manifestations of central planning fail and cause damage mostly because they are inevitably inferior at determing value for others and increasing the value of others.</p>
<p>They also create a moral dissonance because they violate the rights entailed by the self-edivent ownership of oneself.  By denying ownership of oneself and the products of one&#8217;s time, talents and efforts; they are morally bankrupt at their foundation and built upon falsehood and immorality.</p>
<p>I may respond to specific points such as child exploitation, money and education later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

